Paper · 1992 · Crop Science

Intercropping of Maize and Winged Bean

Saiful Hikam; C. G. Poneleit; C. T. MacKown; et al.

20
claims
45
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize ( Zea mays L.) and winged bean [ Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.] have complementary growth habits, biomass production, and protein concentrations. We evaluated yield and protein complementation between maize and winged bean to determine if intercropping can improve the quantity and quality of maize silage. An early and a late‐maturity corn hybrid were intercropped with ‘Tpt1’ winged bean at plant densities of 35 900 and 46 500 plants ha −1 in 1984 and 47 500 plants ha −1 in 1985 near Lexington, KY. In 1984, increased plant density resulted in increased maize vegetation, grain, vegetation N, and grain N yields per hectare (16, 21, 19, and 28%, respectively), while intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each and reduced winged bean vegetation N concentration by 11% and yield per hectare by 40%. Intercropping winged bean with early maize produced 14% more biomass and 39% more N per hectare than did the reference early maize monoculture at post maize physiological maturity. In 1985, intercropping reduced maize vegetation, grain, and grain N yields per hectare (7, 14, and 14%, respectively), and reduced winged bean vegetation yield, N concentration, and N yield per hectare (58, 7, and 61%, respectively). Intercropping with early maize produced 18% more biomass and 67% more N per hectare, whereas intercropping with late maize produced 11% more biomass and 46% more N per hectare than did the respective monoculture maize. Land equivalency ratios for both dry matter and N yields per area were greater than unity for each plant density and intercropping system. Intercropping of maize with winged bean may provide greater biomass and improved protein content of silage in a temperate climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased density raised maize vegetation yield by 16% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increased plant densitye0
Outcome
maize vegetatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased plant density resulted in increased maize vegetation, grain, vegetation N, and grain N yields per hectare (16, 21, 19, and 28%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased density raised maize grain yield by 21% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increased plant densitye0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased plant density resulted in increased maize vegetation, grain, vegetation N, and grain N yields per hectare (16, 21, 19, and 28%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased density raised maize vegetation N yield by 19% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increased plant densitye0
Outcome
vegetation Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased plant density resulted in increased maize vegetation, grain, vegetation N, and grain N yields per hectare (16, 21, 19, and 28%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased density raised maize grain N yield by 28% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increased plant densitye0
Outcome
grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased plant density resulted in increased maize vegetation, grain, vegetation N, and grain N yields per hectare (16, 21, 19, and 28%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping lowered maize grain yield by 8% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping lowered maize grain N yield by 8% in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain N yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping lowered winged bean vegetation N concentration by 11%.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
winged bean vegetation N concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus
Psophocarpus tetragonolobus · TaxonOng Jyh Seng · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced winged bean vegetation N concentration by 11% and yield per hectare by 40%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winged Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping lowered winged bean yield by 40%.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus
Psophocarpus tetragonolobus · TaxonOng Jyh Seng · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced winged bean vegetation N concentration by 11% and yield per hectare by 40%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winged Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-maize intercrop produced 14% more biomass than early-maize monoculture in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercropping winged bean with early maizee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
reference early maize monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping winged bean with early maize produced 14% more biomass and 39% more N per hectare than did the reference early maize monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-maize intercrop produced 39% more N than early-maize monoculture in 1984.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercropping winged bean with early maizee0
Outcome
N per hectaree0
Direction
moree0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
reference early maize monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping winged bean with early maize produced 14% more biomass and 39% more N per hectare than did the reference early maize monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize vegetation yield by 7% in 1985.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
maize vegetatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced maize vegetation, grain, and grain N yields per hectare (7, 14, and 14%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize grain yield by 14% in 1985.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced maize vegetation, grain, and grain N yields per hectare (7, 14, and 14%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize grain N yield by 14% in 1985.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced maize vegetation, grain, and grain N yields per hectare (7, 14, and 14%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced winged bean vegetation yield by 58% in 1985.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
winged bean vegetation yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus
Psophocarpus tetragonolobus · TaxonOng Jyh Seng · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced winged bean vegetation yield, N concentration, and N yield per hectare (58, 7, and 61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winged Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced winged bean N concentration by 7% in 1985.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus
Psophocarpus tetragonolobus · TaxonOng Jyh Seng · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced winged bean vegetation yield, N concentration, and N yield per hectare (58, 7, and 61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winged Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced winged bean N yield by 61% in 1985.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
N yield per hectaree0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus
Psophocarpus tetragonolobus · TaxonOng Jyh Seng · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced winged bean vegetation yield, N concentration, and N yield per hectare (58, 7, and 61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winged Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping reduced maize grain yield and grain N yield per hectare by 8% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-maize intercropping gave 18% more biomass and 67% more N than monoculture in 1985.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercropping with early maizee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with early maize produced 18% more biomass and 67% more N per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-maize intercropping gave 11% more biomass and 46% more N than monoculture in 1985.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercropping with late maizee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
respective monoculture maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with late maize produced 11% more biomass and 46% more N per hectare than did the respective monoculture maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalency ratios for dry matter and N exceeded one under all densities and systems.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Land equivalency ratios for both dry matter and N yields per areae0
Direction
greater than unitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Land equivalency ratios for both dry matter and N yields per area were greater than unity for each plant density and intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping may yield more biomass and better silage protein content in a temperate climate.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Intercropping of maize with winged beane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of maize with winged bean may provide greater biomass and improved protein content of silage in a temperate climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

184 papers: 138 positive, 46 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

intercropping · yield · Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (winged bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

intercropping · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 33 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (winged bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.