Paper · 1993 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Integrated Nitrogen Management with Green Manures in Rice‐Chickpea Cropping System

A. L. Rathore; S. L. Patel; G. P. Pali

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted during wet and dry seasons of 1987–88 and 1988–89 to evaluate the performance of green manures with and without fertilizer nitrogen in lowland rice and their residual effect on succeeding crop of chickpea grown under rice‐chickpea cropping system. Incorporation of Ipomea carnea (green leaves), Cassia tora and Parthenium hysterophorus (green young plants) ca. 5 t/ha fresh weight significantly improved yield and yield components namely panicles per hill, panicle length, grains per panicle and test weight of transplanted rice. The results showed that at least 20 kg/ha fertilizer nitrogen applied to rice could be replaced by incorporation of 5 t/ha fresh weight green manure. Supplementation of 60 kg N/ha through urea to the green manures treated plots proved to be the best in respect of grain yield and was comparable to the yield obtained under 80 kg N/ha as urea alone. Plant N‐uptake followed the similar pattern of rice grain yield. Residual fertility in terms of available nitrogen increased under the green manure treatments, whereas urea nitrogen alone made no impact on fertility build‐up. Green manures showed significantly higher residual response than fertilizer N alone to seed yield and N uptake of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ipomea carnea green manure improved rice yield and components.

Treatment
Ipomea carnea (green leaves)e0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
ca. 5 t/ha fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Ipomea carnea (green leaves), Cassia tora and Parthenium hysterophorus (green young plants) ca. 5 t/ha fresh weight significantly improved yield and yield components namely panicles per hill, panicle length, grains per panicle and test weight of transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassia tora green manure improved rice yield and components.

Treatment
Cassia torae0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
ca. 5 t/ha fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Ipomea carnea (green leaves), Cassia tora and Parthenium hysterophorus (green young plants) ca. 5 t/ha fresh weight significantly improved yield and yield components namely panicles per hill, panicle length, grains per panicle and test weight of transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parthenium hysterophorus green manure improved rice yield and components.

Treatment
Parthenium hysterophorus (green young plants)e0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
ca. 5 t/ha fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Ipomea carnea (green leaves), Cassia tora and Parthenium hysterophorus (green young plants) ca. 5 t/ha fresh weight significantly improved yield and yield components namely panicles per hill, panicle length, grains per panicle and test weight of transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure replaced at least 20 kg/ha fertilizer N in rice.

Outcome
fertilizer nitrogen applied to rice could be replacede0
Value
at least 20 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at least 20 kg/ha fertilizer nitrogen applied to rice could be replaced by incorporation of 5 t/ha fresh weight green manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 60 kg N/ha urea to green manure produced the best rice grain yield, comparable with 80 kg N/ha urea.

Treatment
60 kg N/ha through urea to the green manures treated plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
80 kg N/ha as urea alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementation of 60 kg N/ha through urea to the green manures treated plots proved to be the best in respect of grain yield and was comparable to the yield obtained under 80 kg N/ha as urea alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice N uptake followed the grain yield pattern.

Outcome
Plant N‐uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant N‐uptake followed the similar pattern of rice grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased available nitrogen residual fertility.

Treatment
green manure treatmentse0
Outcome
Residual fertility in terms of available nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual fertility in terms of available nitrogen increased under the green manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea alone did not build residual soil fertility.

Outcome
fertility build‐upe0
Direction
no impacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea nitrogen alone made no impact on fertility build‐up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure had a higher residual effect on chickpea seed yield than fertilizer nitrogen alone.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Green manurese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fertilizer N alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manures showed significantly higher residual response than fertilizer N alone to seed yield and N uptake of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure had a higher residual effect on chickpea N uptake than fertilizer nitrogen alone.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Green manurese0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fertilizer N alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manures showed significantly higher residual response than fertilizer N alone to seed yield and N uptake of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1269 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.