Abstract
Yield parameters (insect control, lint yield, lint percentage, and micronaire) of 2 cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., genotypes (‘Coker 310’, an adapted cultivar, and an insect nonpreferred strain, OFNRS = okra leaf, frego bract, nectariless, and red stem) varied according to different insecticide spray programs. Insecticides included organophosphates, pyrethroids, organophosphate: pyrethroid combinations, and an experimental molt inhibiting insecticide. Bollworms, Heliothis spp., and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, were reduced in the OFNRS genotype and yield was significantly higher than Coker 310 during an intense infestation when chemical control was poor. Of 14 insecticide treatments tested, combinations of certain pyrethroids with methyl parathion had greatest efficacy and yield of seed cotton. Fiber properties were influenced by insecticide treatment and date of initial spray application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton yield parameters varied among insecticide spray programs.
- Taxon
- cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- different insecticide spray programse0
- Outcome
- insect control, lint yield, lint percentage, and micronairee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield parameters (insect control, lint yield, lint percentage, and micronaire) of 2 cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., genotypes (‘Coker 310’, an adapted cultivar, and an insect nonpreferred strain, OFNRS = okra leaf, frego bract, nectariless, and red stem) varied according to different insecticide spray programs.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bollworms were reduced in OFNRS during intense infestation with poor chemical control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- OFNRS genotypee0
- Outcome
- Bollworms, Heliothis spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- intense infestation when chemical control was poore0
HeliothisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bollworms, Heliothis spp., and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, were reduced in the OFNRS genotype and yield was significantly higher than Coker 310 during an intense infestation when chemical control was poor.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Boll weevils were reduced in OFNRS during intense infestation with poor chemical control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- OFNRS genotypee0
- Interactor
- Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman
Anthonomus grandise0pest - Outcome
- boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Bohemane0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- intense infestation when chemical control was poore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bollworms, Heliothis spp., and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, were reduced in the OFNRS genotype and yield was significantly higher than Coker 310 during an intense infestation when chemical control was poor.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
OFNRS yielded significantly more than Coker 310 under intense infestation when chemical control was poor.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- OFNRS genotypee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- intense infestation when chemical control was poore0
- Comparator
- Coker 310e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“were reduced in the OFNRS genotype and yield was significantly higher than Coker 310 during an intense infestation when chemical control was poor.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Certain pyrethroid and methyl parathion combinations had the greatest insecticide efficacy.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- combinations of certain pyrethroids with methyl parathione0
- Outcome
- efficacye0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Comparator
- 14 insecticide treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Of 14 insecticide treatments tested, combinations of certain pyrethroids with methyl parathion had greatest efficacy and yield of seed cotton.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Certain pyrethroid and methyl parathion combinations had the greatest seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- combinations of certain pyrethroids with methyl parathione0
- Outcome
- yield of seed cottone0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Comparator
- 14 insecticide treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Of 14 insecticide treatments tested, combinations of certain pyrethroids with methyl parathion had greatest efficacy and yield of seed cotton.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Fiber properties varied with insecticide treatment and the date of first spray.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- insecticide treatment and date of initial spray applicatione0
- Outcome
- Fiber propertiese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fiber properties were influenced by insecticide treatment and date of initial spray application.”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
parathion-methyl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
parathion-methyl · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.