Paper · 1990 · jpa

Seed Size/Shape and Tillage System Effect on Corn Growth and Grain Yield

L. M. Graven; P. R. Carter

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape on field performance of commercially available corn hybrids under conventional tillage (CT) and no‐tillage (NT). Field studies were conducted in 1987 and 1988 under the two tillage systems with small‐round, small‐flat, large‐round, and large‐flat seed of hybrids LH74xLH51 and A632xLH39, on Piano silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic Typic Argiudoll) soil at Arlington and Janes‐ville, WI. At Arlington, there were also early (mid‐ to late‐April) and late (mid‐ to late‐May) planting dates. Under such stressful conditions as early planting, NT, and soil crusting during emergence, small‐round seed often was 5 to 15% lower in emergence than small‐flat and large‐round seed. Emergence rate, vegetative dry weight, silk date, grain yield (at similar stands accomplished by overplanting and thinning), and other growth parameters measured were not influenced consistently by seed size/shape. No‐tillage and early planting resulted in cold soil at planting, which delayed emergence, early growth, and silking and often reduced grain yield compared with CT, but tillage system by seed size/shape interactions were not important for these factors. These results indicate that corn producers should focus on genetic potential, seed quality, and seed price rather than specific seed sizes/shapes when selecting hybrids, except when planting under stressful conditions. With very early planting or NT, it may be advisable to avoid small‐round seed, or to increase seeding rate by 10 to 15% with this seed size/shape in order to obtain the desired stand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stressful conditions, small-round corn seed had 5 to 15% lower emergence than small-flat and large-round seed.

Treatment
small‐round seede1
Outcome
emergencee1
Direction
lowere1
Value
5 to 15%e1
Qualifier
stressful conditionse1
Comparator
small‐flat and large‐round seede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under such stressful conditions as early planting, NT, and soil crusting during emergence, small‐round seed often was 5 to 15% lower in emergence than small‐flat and large‐round seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emergence rate, vegetative dry weight, silk date and grain yield were not influenced consistently by seed size/shape.

Treatment
seed size/shapee2
Outcome
Emergence rate, vegetative dry weight, silk date, grain yielde2
Direction
not influenced consistentlye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“Emergence rate, vegetative dry weight, silk date, grain yield (at similar stands accomplished by overplanting and thinning), and other growth parameters measured were not influenced consistently by seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with early planting reduced corn grain yield compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
No‐tillage and early plantinge3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“No‐tillage and early planting resulted in cold soil at planting, which delayed emergence, early growth, and silking and often reduced grain yield compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with early planting delayed corn emergence, early growth and silking compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
No‐tillage and early plantinge3
Outcome
emergence, early growth, and silkinge3
Direction
delayede3
Comparator
CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“No‐tillage and early planting resulted in cold soil at planting, which delayed emergence, early growth, and silking and often reduced grain yield compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tillage system by seed size/shape interaction was not important for emergence, growth and yield.

Treatment
tillage systeme4
Outcome
tillage system by seed size/shape interactionse4
Direction
not importante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“tillage system by seed size/shape interactions were not important for these factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1225 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Corn producers should focus on genetic potential, seed quality and seed price rather than seed size/shape when selecting hybrids.

Outcome
focus on genetic potential, seed quality, and seed pricee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn producers should focus on genetic potential, seed quality, and seed price rather than specific seed sizes/shapes when selecting hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1395 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under very early planting or no-tillage, increasing seeding rate by 10 to 15% is advisable with small-round seed.

Treatment
small‐round seede6
Outcome
increase seeding ratee6
Value
10 to 15%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of corn ( Zea mays L.) seed size/shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–90 · show in text ↑
e6

“it may be advisable to avoid small‐round seed, or to increase seeding rate by 10 to 15% with this seed size/shape in order to obtain the desired stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1628 · show in text ↑

property · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Seed size did not affect yield of either corn hybrid in uniform or mixed plantings.

    Seed Size Effects on Yields of Two Corn Hybrids · 1992 · compared with uniform seed size or were mixtures of sizes

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sowing time · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 38 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 178 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.