Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Transition from Intensive Tillage to No‐Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems

Perry R. Miller; David E. Buschena; Clain A. Jones; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Transition to no‐till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4‐yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [ Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [ Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [ Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [ Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [ Zea mays L.], proso millet [ Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [ Triticum aestivum L.]). No‐till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha −1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate‐N and Olsen‐P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per‐ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat in the organic system yielded equal to or more than in the no-till systems, even though 117 kg N ha-1 was applied to the no-till winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ORG systeme0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
equal or greatere0
Comparator
NT systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat in the organic system had superior grain quality compared with the no-till systems.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ORG systeme0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
NT systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 years soil nitrate-N was 41% lower in the organic system.

Treatment
ORG systeme0
Outcome
soil nitrate‐Ne0
Direction
lowere0
Value
41e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After 4 yr, soil nitrate‐N and Olsen‐P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 years soil Olsen-P was 14% lower in the organic system.

Treatment
ORG systeme0
Outcome
Olsen‐Pe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After 4 yr, soil nitrate‐N and Olsen‐P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 years potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the organic system.

Treatment
ORG systeme0
Outcome
potentially mineralizable Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After 4 yr, soil nitrate‐N and Olsen‐P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 years total economic net returns per hectare were equal between no-till and organic systems.

Treatment
ORGe0
Outcome
total economic net returnse0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
NTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per‐ha basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1139 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.