Paper · 2022 · Romanian Agricultural Research

Grain Yield and Hectolitre Weight of Some Wheat Cultivars in Organic and Conventional Production Systems

Ioana Claudia Dunăreanu; Dorina Bonea

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For organic agriculture, wheat cultivars with good and stable grain yield across years are needed. Grain yield and hectolitre weight of 10 cultivars were estimated in field trials for three years at conventionally and organically production systems under the central part of Oltenia, Romania conditions. Our research evidentiated that cultivar influenced significant only hectolitre weight; production system influenced significant the both grain yield and hectolitre weight, and interaction between cultivars x production system was non-significant for the both traits. On average for the study period, the grain yield from the organic production system was by 35% lower than that achieved from the conventional production system. Hectolitre weight was also, affected by production system showing in the organic system values by 2% lower than in the conventional system. The cultivar Miranda was more stable than the other studied cultivars in both conventional and organic production system. On average most cultivars fulfilled the requirements for Grades 2 and 3, but the percentage of cases below the 72 kg/hl limit (non bakery value) varied from 0 to 66.7% in both production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar significantly influenced hectolitre weight only.

Treatment
cultivare1
Outcome
hectolitre weighte1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivar influenced significant only hectolitre weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–389 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Production system significantly influenced grain yield.

Treatment
production systeme2
Outcome
grain yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“production system influenced significant the both grain yield and hectolitre weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–474 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Production system significantly influenced hectolitre weight.

Treatment
production systeme2
Outcome
hectolitre weighte2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“production system influenced significant the both grain yield and hectolitre weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–474 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between cultivars and production system was non-significant for both traits.

Treatment
cultivars x production systeme4
Outcome
interactione4
Direction
non-significante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“interaction between cultivars x production system was non-significant for the both traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, grain yield in the organic system was 35% lower than in the conventional system.

Treatment
organic production systeme5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
lowere5
Value
35%e5
Comparator
conventional production systeme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“On average for the study period, the grain yield from the organic production system was by 35% lower than that achieved from the conventional production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hectolitre weight in the organic system was 2% lower than in the conventional system.

Treatment
organic systeme6
Outcome
Hectolitre weighte6
Direction
lowere6
Value
2%e6
Comparator
conventional systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“Hectolitre weight was also, affected by production system showing in the organic system values by 2% lower than in the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–870 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Miranda was more stable than the other studied cultivars in both production systems.

Material
Mirandae7
Outcome
more stablee7
Comparator
other studied cultivarse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e7

“The cultivar Miranda was more stable than the other studied cultivars in both conventional and organic production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average most cultivars fulfilled the requirements for Grades 2 and 3.

Outcome
requirements for Grades 2 and 3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average most cultivars fulfilled the requirements for Grades 2 and 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of cases below the 72 kg/hl limit varied from 0 to 66.7% across cultivars in both systems.

Outcome
percentage of cases below the 72 kg/hl limite1
Value
0 to 66.7%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percentage of cases below the 72 kg/hl limit (non bakery value) varied from 0 to 66.7% in both production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1188 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.