Paper · 2014 · Annals of Applied Biology

Seed dormancy and hybridization effect of the invasive species, Helianthus annuus

A. Presotto; M. Poverene; M. Cantamutto

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Helianthus annuus is an invasive alien species naturalised in the central region of Argentina where it shares an extended area with the sunflower crop. As this species has also invaded several other sunflower crop growing areas in the world, it severely restricts the use of new technologies, for example herbicide tolerance by genetic modification. The natural seed dormancy of the wild Helianthus strains from the centre of origin in North America is well known, but the seed dormancy of the invasive biotypes is still unknown. Dormancy is a fitness trait related to the establishment, dispersion and persistence of invasive weeds. Four experiments were designed to investigate the effect of the pericarp, light, temperature, the after‐ripening period and hybridization with the DK3880CL sunflower crop ( F1 ) on the seed dormancy of five invasive H. annuus biotypes. The results showed that pericarp scarification increased imbibition of the whole achene by 19%. Light stimulation only increased germination in the wild biotype without any effect on the domesticated sunflower. A period of 12 months after‐ripening at 5°C reduced seed dormancy in the wild biotype and its progeny; the optimal temperature for seed germination at this period was found to be 15°C. Mechanical scarification was the best treatment for overcoming seed dormancy with a differential germination, in the biotypes with the highest response, superior to 63%. Hybridization with domesticated sunflower had a minimal or no effect on seed dormancy but the germination rate was improved in three F1 crosses. Wild biotype dormancy appears to be governed by the maternal pericarp and intrinsic hormone regulation. An increased germination rate of some progenies could constitute an advantage during seedling establishment but only in winters without any frost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp scarification increased whole-achene imbibition by 19%.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
pericarp scarificatione0
Outcome
imbibition of the whole achenee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pericarp scarification increased imbibition of the whole achene by 19%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased wild-biotype germination.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Material
wild biotypee0
Treatment
Light stimulatione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light stimulation only increased germination in the wild biotype without any effect on the domesticated sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light had no stated effect on domesticated sunflower germination.

Taxon
domesticated sunflowere0
Treatment
Light stimulatione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
without any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Light stimulation only increased germination in the wild biotype without any effect on the domesticated sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve months of after-ripening at 5°C reduced dormancy in the wild biotype and its progeny.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Material
wild biotype and its progenye0
Treatment
12 months after‐ripening at 5°Ce0
Outcome
seed dormancye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A period of 12 months after‐ripening at 5°C reduced seed dormancy in the wild biotype and its progeny;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal germination temperature after after-ripening was 15°C.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
optimal temperature for seed germinatione0
Value
15°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal temperature for seed germination at this period was found to be 15°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification best overcame dormancy, with germination differences over 63% in the most responsive biotypes.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Mechanical scarificatione0
Outcome
differential germinatione0
Direction
beste0
Value
63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical scarification was the best treatment for overcoming seed dormancy with a differential germination, in the biotypes with the highest response, superior to 63%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybridization with domesticated sunflower had minimal or no dormancy effect.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Hybridization with domesticated sunflowere0
Outcome
seed dormancye0
Direction
minimal or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybridization with domesticated sunflower had a minimal or no effect on seed dormancy but the germination rate was improved in three F1 crosses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybridization improved germination rate in three F1 crosses.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Hybridization with domesticated sunflowere0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
three F1 crossese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybridization with domesticated sunflower had a minimal or no effect on seed dormancy but the germination rate was improved in three F1 crosses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer maternal pericarp and intrinsic hormone regulation of wild dormancy.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
Wild biotype dormancye0
Qualifier
maternal pericarp and intrinsic hormone regulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wild biotype dormancy appears to be governed by the maternal pericarp and intrinsic hormone regulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faster germination could aid establishment only in frost-free winters.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
advantage during seedling establishmente0
Qualifier
only in winters without any froste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increased germination rate of some progenies could constitute an advantage during seedling establishment but only in winters without any frost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 13 positive, 10 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.