Paper · 2015 · Annals of Botany

Free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) reduces the inhibitory effect of soil nitrate on N2fixation ofPisum sativum

Clayton R. Butterly; Roger Armstrong; Deli Chen; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Additional carbohydrate supply resulting from enhanced photosynthesis under predicted future elevated CO2 is likely to increase symbiotic nitrogen (N) fixation in legumes. This study examined the interactive effects of atmospheric CO2 and nitrate (NO3(-)) concentration on the growth, nodulation and N fixation of field pea (Pisum sativum) in a semi-arid cropping system. METHODS: Field pea was grown for 15 weeks in a Vertosol containing 5, 25, 50 or 90 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) under either ambient CO2 (aCO2; 390 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO2; 550 ppm) using free-air CO2 enrichment (SoilFACE). KEY RESULTS: Under aCO2, field pea biomass was significantly lower at 5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) than at 90 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) soil. However, increasing the soil N level significantly reduced nodulation of lateral roots but not the primary root, and nodules were significantly smaller, with 85% less nodule mass in the 90 NO3(-)-N kg(-1) than in the 5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) treatment, highlighting the inhibitory effects of NO3(-). Field pea grown under eCO2 had greater biomass (approx. 30%) than those grown under aCO2, and was not affected by N level. Overall, the inhibitory effects of NO3(-) on nodulation and nodule mass appeared to be reduced under eCO2 compared with aCO2, although the effects of CO2 on root growth were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated CO2 alleviated the inhibitory effect of soil NO3(-) on nodulation and N2 fixation and is likely to lead to greater total N content of field pea growing under future elevated CO2 environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under ambient CO2, pea biomass was lower at 5 than 90 mg nitrate nitrogen per kg soil.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
aCO2e0
Comparator
90 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Under aCO2, field pea biomass was significantly lower at 5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) than at 90 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil nitrogen significantly reduced lateral root nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing the soil N levele0
Outcome
nodulation of lateral rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the soil N level significantly reduced nodulation of lateral roots but not the primary root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil nitrogen did not reduce primary root nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing the soil N levele0
Outcome
nodulation of lateral roots but not the primary roote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the soil N level significantly reduced nodulation of lateral roots but not the primary root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate produced smaller nodules.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
90 NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0
Outcome
nodulese0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodules were significantly smaller, with 85% less nodule mass in the 90 NO3(-)-N kg(-1) than in the 5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule mass was 85% lower at the higher nitrate rate.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
90 NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0
Outcome
nodule masse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
85%e0
Comparator
5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% less nodule mass in the 90 NO3(-)-N kg(-1) than in the 5 mg NO3(-)-N kg(-1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised pea biomass by approximately 30% versus ambient CO2.

Taxon
Field peae0
Treatment
eCO2e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
approx. 30%e0
Comparator
aCO2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Field pea grown under eCO2 had greater biomass (approx. 30%) than those grown under aCO2, and was not affected by N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea biomass under elevated CO2 was unaffected by nitrogen level.

Taxon
Field peae0
Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
biomasse0
Qualifier
eCO2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Field pea grown under eCO2 had greater biomass (approx. 30%) than those grown under aCO2, and was not affected by N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 appeared to reduce nitrate inhibition of nodulation and nodule mass.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
eCO2e0
Outcome
inhibitory effects of NO3(-) on nodulation and nodule masse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
aCO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibitory effects of NO3(-) on nodulation and nodule mass appeared to be reduced under eCO2 compared with aCO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 effects on root growth were not significant.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
CO2e0
Outcome
root growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of CO2 on root growth were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 alleviated nitrate inhibition of nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Elevated CO2e0
Outcome
N2 fixatione0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO2 alleviated the inhibitory effect of soil NO3(-) on nodulation and N2 fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 is expected to increase total nitrogen content in future pea environments.

Taxon
field peae0
Outcome
total N contente0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
future elevated CO2 environmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“is likely to lead to greater total N content of field pea growing under future elevated CO2 environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1560 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

co2 · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 19 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.