Paper · 2003 · Physiologia Plantarum

Involvement of cytokinin in the stimulation of nodulation by low concentrations of ammonium inPisum sativum

Houman Fei; J. Kevin Vessey

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nodulation in pea ( Pisum sativum L.) grown in hydroponic and sand culture systems is stimulated by low concentrations (<1.0 m M ) of ammonium, but the physiological mechanisms underlying this stimulation are unknown. The current study involves a series of experiments, which investigate if the ammonium‐induced stimulation of nodulation involves changes in endogenous hormone (auxin and cytokinin) levels. P. sativum L. cv. Express was grown in growth pouches for 1 week with mineral N (0.5 and 2.0 m M NH 4 + or NO 3 – ) or for 3 weeks exposed to exogenous indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) or 6‐benzylaminopurine (BAP) at a range of concentrations (10 ‐9 −10 ‐5 M ). Ammonium enhanced nodulation on the basis of both early whole plant (nodules plant −1 ) and specific nodulation (nodules g −1 root DW), especially in 0.5 m M treatment in which nodulation was approximately 4‐fold of the mineral‐N‐free control 1 week after inoculation. Correspondingly, the roots treated with ammonium contained much higher levels of t ‐zeatin (Z) and lower t ‐zeatin riboside (ZR) than that the control or nitrate‐treated plants. There was no significant difference in IAA levels between the control and ammonium treatments. Exogenous application of BAP for 3 weeks at concentrations of 10 ‐7 −10 ‐5 M strongly inhibited nodulation. However, 10 −9 M BAP, but not IAA, significantly enhanced nodulation. These data support the theory that a relatively high ratio of cytokinin:auxin in roots is favourable for nodule initiation, but that an excessively high level of cytokinin inhibits nodulation. Based on these results we propose that stimulation of nodulation by low concentrations of ammonium may be mediated through increasing Z level in roots, which alters the balance of cytokinin and auxin, which in turn induces cortical cell divisions leading to nodule initiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium enhanced whole plant and specific nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Ammoniume0
Outcome
early whole plant (nodules plant −1 ) and specific nodulation (nodules g −1 root DW)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ammonium enhanced nodulation on the basis of both early whole plant (nodules plant −1 ) and specific nodulation (nodules g −1 root DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5 mM ammonium treatment yielded approximately fourfold nodulation relative to the nitrogen-free control.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
0.5 m M treatmente0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Value
approximately 4‐folde0
Comparator
mineral‐N‐free controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“especially in 0.5 m M treatment in which nodulation was approximately 4‐fold of the mineral‐N‐free control 1 week after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium raised root t-zeatin levels.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
ammoniume0
Outcome
levels of t ‐zeatin (Z)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“roots treated with ammonium contained much higher levels of t ‐zeatin (Z)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium lowered root t-zeatin riboside.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
ammoniume0
Outcome
t ‐zeatin riboside (ZR)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control or nitrate‐treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“roots treated with ammonium contained much higher levels of t ‐zeatin (Z) and lower t ‐zeatin riboside (ZR) than that the control or nitrate‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA levels did not differ significantly between control and ammonium treatments.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
ammonium treatmentse0
Outcome
IAA levelse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant difference in IAA levels between the control and ammonium treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP at 10−7 to 10−5 M inhibited nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
BAP for 3 weeks at concentrations of 10 ‐7 −10 ‐5 Me0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exogenous application of BAP for 3 weeks at concentrations of 10 ‐7 −10 ‐5 M strongly inhibited nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low BAP concentration significantly enhanced nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
10 −9 M BAPe0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“10 −9 M BAP, but not IAA, significantly enhanced nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at the tested low concentration did not enhance nodulation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
nodulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“10 −9 M BAP, but not IAA, significantly enhanced nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1381 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: hormones · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.