Paper · 2011 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on growth, nitrogen fixation, and nutrient uptake in Cicer arietinum (L.) under salt stress

NEERA GARG; SHIKHA CHANDEL

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
51
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Most legumes in natural conditions form a symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. AM fungi in saline soils have been reported to improve salinity tolerance and growth in plants. In the present study, interaction between mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae, and salinity stress in relation to plant growth, nitrogen fixation, and nutrient accumulation was evaluated in Cicer arietinum (L.) (chickpea). Two genotypes of chickpea (Pusa-329, salt tolerant, and Pusa-240, salt sensitive) were compared under different levels of salinity with and without mycorrhizal inoculations. Salt stress resulted in a noticeable decline in shoot and root dry matter accumulation, resulting in a decline in the shoot-to-root ratio (SRR) in all plants. However, Pusa-329 was found to be more tolerant to salinity than Pusa-240. AM plants exhibited better growth and biomass accumulation under stressed as well as unstressed conditions. Mycorrhizal infection (MI) was reduced with increasing salinity levels, but the mycorrhizal dependency (MD) increased, which was more evident in Pusa-240. Salinity resulted in a marked decline in the nodule dry weights, whereas a surge in the nodule number was recorded. Nitrogenase activity was reduced with increasing salt concentrations. AM plants had considerably higher nodule numbers, dry weights, and nitrogenase activity under both saline and nonsaline environments. Pusa-329 had a comparatively lower Na^+ concentration and higher K^+ and Ca^{2+} concentrations than Pusa-240. Although nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents declined with increasing salinity, Pusa-329 had higher levels of N and P as compared with Pusa-240. Plants inoculated with Glomus mosseae had better plant growth and nitrogen fixation under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced shoot and root dry matter and shoot to root ratio.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot and root dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress resulted in a noticeable decline in shoot and root dry matter accumulation, resulting in a decline in the shoot-to-root ratio (SRR) in all plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced shoot to root ratio.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot-to-root ratio (SRR)e0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress resulted in a noticeable decline in shoot and root dry matter accumulation, resulting in a decline in the shoot-to-root ratio (SRR) in all plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa-329 was more salt tolerant than Pusa-240.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Pusa-329e0
Outcome
tolerant to salinitye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Pusa-240e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa-329 was found to be more tolerant to salinity than Pusa-240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had better growth and biomass under both stress conditions.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AM plantse0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and biomass accumulatione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM plants exhibited better growth and biomass accumulation under stressed as well as unstressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection declined as salinity increased.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelse0
Outcome
Mycorrhizal infection (MI)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal infection (MI) was reduced with increasing salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal dependency increased with salinity, especially in Pusa-240.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Pusa-240e0
Outcome
mycorrhizal dependency (MD)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mycorrhizal dependency (MD) increased, which was more evident in Pusa-240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced nodule dry weight.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
nodule dry weightse0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity resulted in a marked decline in the nodule dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased nodule number.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
surgee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a surge in the nodule number was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogenase activity declined as salt concentration rose.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing salt concentrationse0
Outcome
Nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogenase activity was reduced with increasing salt concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM plants had higher nodule number and dry weight in saline and nonsaline conditions.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AM plantse0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbers, dry weights, and nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM plants had considerably higher nodule numbers, dry weights, and nitrogenase activity under both saline and nonsaline environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa-329 contained less sodium than Pusa-240.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Pusa-329e0
Outcome
Na^+ concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Pusa-240e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa-329 had a comparatively lower Na^+ concentration and higher K^+ and Ca^{2+} concentrations than Pusa-240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa-329 contained more potassium and calcium than Pusa-240.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Pusa-329e0
Outcome
K^+ and Ca^{2+} concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa-240e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa-329 had a comparatively lower Na^+ concentration and higher K^+ and Ca^{2+} concentrations than Pusa-240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus contents declined as salinity increased.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contentse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents declined with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa-329 retained more nitrogen and phosphorus than Pusa-240.

Taxon
Cicer arietinum (L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Pusa-329e0
Outcome
levels of N and Pe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa-240e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa-329 had higher levels of N and P as compared with Pusa-240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107 · show in text ↑

salinity · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.