Paper · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Comparative study of nitrogen fixation and carbon metabolism in two chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under salt stress

M Soussi

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two cultivars of Cicer arietinum with differential tolerance to salinity have been compared by analysing growth, photosynthesis, nodulation, nitrogenase activity, and carbon metabolism in the nodule cytosol. The aim was to help elucidate the relationships between, on the one hand, sucrose and malate metabolism in nodules and, on the other, the inhibition of nitrogen fixation under salt stress. Chick-pea cultivars Pedrosillano (sensitive) and ILC1919 (tolerant) inoculated with Mesorhizobium ciceri strain Ch-191 were grown in a controlled environmental chamber and were treated with salt (0, 50, 75, and 100 mM NaCl) from sowing to harvest time (28 d). Plant growth and photo- synthesis were more affected by salt in Pedrosillano than in ILC1919. Also the effect of salt on nodulation and nitrogen fixation was much more pronounced in Pedrosillano. The increase in nodular mass in ILC1919 can partially counteract the inhibition of nitrogenase activity. The enzymes of sucrose breakdown were inhibited by NaCl, but in ILC1919 a rise in alkaline invertase was observed with salinity, which could compensate for the lack of the sucrose synthase hydrolytic activity. The activity of PEPC was stimulated by salt in ILC1919. Also, this cultivar showed higher malate concentrations in root nodules.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt affected growth and photosynthesis more in Pedrosillano than ILC1919.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
Pedrosillanoe0
Treatment
salte0
Outcome
Plant growth and photo- synthesise0
Direction
more affectede0
Comparator
ILC1919e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and photo- synthesis were more affected by salt in Pedrosillano than in ILC1919.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt affected nodulation and nitrogen fixation more in Pedrosillano.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
Pedrosillanoe0
Treatment
salte0
Outcome
nodulation and nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
much more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also the effect of salt on nodulation and nitrogen fixation was much more pronounced in Pedrosillano.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nodular mass in ILC1919 partly counteracted nitrogenase inhibition.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC1919e0
Outcome
inhibition of nitrogenase activitye0
Qualifier
increase in nodular masse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in nodular mass in ILC1919 can partially counteract the inhibition of nitrogenase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl inhibited enzymes of sucrose breakdown.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
enzymes of sucrose breakdowne0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enzymes of sucrose breakdown were inhibited by NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline invertase rose with salinity in ILC1919.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC1919e0
Treatment
salinitye0
Gene
alkaline invertasee0
Outcome
alkaline invertasee0
Direction
risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in ILC1919 a rise in alkaline invertase was observed with salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stimulated PEPC activity in ILC1919.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC1919e0
Treatment
salte0
Gene
PEPCe0
Outcome
activity of PEPCe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of PEPC was stimulated by salt in ILC1919.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILC1919 had higher malate concentrations in root nodules.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC1919t1
Organ / stage
root nodulese0
Outcome
malate concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, this cultivar showed higher malate concentrations in root nodules.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“in ILC1919 a rise in alkaline invertase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1058 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.