Paper · 2008 · PubMed

Effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase for growth promotion of peas (Pisum sativum) under drought conditions.

Z A Zahir; A Munir; H N Asghar; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
320
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A series of experiments were conducted to assess the effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane- 1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase for growth promotion of peas under drought conditions. Ten rhizobacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of different crops (peas, wheat, and maize) were screened for their growth promoting ability in peas under axenic condition. Three rhizobacterial isolates, Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5), P. fluorescens (ACC-14), and P. putida biotype A (Q-7), were selected for pot trial on the basis of their source, ACC deaminase activity, root colonization, and growth promoting activity under axenic conditions. Inoculated and uninoculated (control) seeds of pea cultivar 2000 were sown in pots (4 seeds/pot) at different soil moisture levels (25, 50, 75, and 100% of field capacity). Results revealed that decreasing the soil moisture levels from 100 to 25% of field capacity significantly decreased the growth of peas. However, inoculation of peas with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase significantly decreased the "drought stress imposed effects" on growth of peas, although with variable efficacy at different moisture levels. At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls. It is highly likely that rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase might have decreased the drought-stress induced ethylene in inoculated plants, which resulted in better growth of plants even at low moisture levels. Therefore, inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase could be helpful in eliminating the inhibitory effects of drought stress on the growth of peas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower soil moisture significantly reduced pea growth.

Treatment
decreasing the soil moisture levels from 100 to 25% of field capacitye0
Outcome
growth of pease0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the soil moisture levels from 100 to 25% of field capacity significantly decreased the growth of peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC-deaminase rhizobacterial inoculation significantly reduced drought effects on pea growth.

Material
pea cultivar 2000e1
Treatment
inoculation of peas with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminasee0
Interactor
rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminasee0symbiont
Outcome
"drought stress imposed effects" on growth of pease0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
uninoculated (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of peas with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase significantly decreased the "drought stress imposed effects" on growth of peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculated and uninoculated (control) seeds of pea cultivar 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea fresh weight by 45% over uninoculated controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
45e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea dry weight by 150% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
150e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea root length by 92% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
92e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea shoot length by 45% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
45e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea leaves per plant by 140% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
increasese0
Value
140e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea fresh-weight water use efficiency by 46% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basise0
Direction
increasese0
Value
46e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, ACC-5 increased pea dry-weight water use efficiency by 147% over controls.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5)Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basise0
Direction
increasese0
Value
147%e0
Comparator
respective uninoculated controlse0
Setting
25% field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest soil moisture level (25% field capacity), rhizobacterial isolate Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G (ACC-5) was found to be more promising compared with the other isolates, as it caused maximum increases in fresh weight, dry weight, root length, shoot length, number of leaves per plant, and water use efficiency on fresh and dry weight basis (45, 150, 92, 45, 140, 46, and 147%, respectively) compared with respective uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize that ACC-deaminase rhizobacteria lowered drought-induced ethylene, improving pea growth.

Interactor
rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminasee0symbiont
Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
better growth of plantse0
Qualifier
drought-stress inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase might have decreased the drought-stress induced ethylene in inoculated plants, which resulted in better growth of plants even at low moisture levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1851 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ACC-deaminase rhizobacterial inoculation for reducing drought inhibition of pea growth.

Interactor
rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminasee0symbiont
Outcome
eliminating the inhibitory effects of drought stress on the growth of pease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase could be helpful in eliminating the inhibitory effects of drought stress on the growth of peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–2014 · show in text ↑

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

soil water · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.