Paper · 2015 · Frontiers in Microbiology

The effect of D123 wheat as a companion crop on soil enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial communities in the rhizosphere of watermelon

Weihui Xu; Zhigang Wang; Fengzhi Wu

11
claims
34
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growth of watermelon is often threatened by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Fon) in successively monocultured soil, which results in economic loss. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of D123 wheat as a companion crop on soil enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial communities in the rhizosphere of watermelon and to explore the relationship between the effect and the incidence of wilt caused by Fon. The results showed that the activities of soil polyphenol oxidase, urease and invertase were increased, the microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) were significantly increased, and the ratio of MBC/MBN was decreased (P < 0.05). Real-time PCR analysis showed that the Fon population declined significantly in the watermelon/wheat companion system compared with the monoculture system (P < 0.05). The analysis of microbial communities showed that the relative abundance of microbial communities was changed in the rhizosphere of watermelon. Compared with the monoculture system, the relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes and Sordariomycetes were increased, and the relative abundances of Gammaproteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Cytophagia, Pezizomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes were decreased in the rhizosphere of watermelon in the watermelon/wheat companion system; importantly, the incidence of Fusarium wilt was also decreased in the watermelon/wheat companion system. In conclusion, this study indicated that D123 wheat as a companion crop increased soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass, decreased the Fon population, and changed the relative abundance of microbial communities in the rhizosphere of watermelon, which may be related to the reduction of Fusarium wilt in the watermelon/wheat companion system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat companion cropping increased soil polyphenol oxidase, urease and invertase activities in the watermelon rhizosphere.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
activities of soil polyphenol oxidase, urease and invertasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the activities of soil polyphenol oxidase, urease and invertase were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping significantly increased microbial biomass nitrogen.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping significantly increased microbial biomass phosphorus.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping decreased the MBC/MBN ratio.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
ratio of MBC/MBNe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ratio of MBC/MBN was decreased (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fon population declined significantly in companion-cropped watermelon versus monoculture.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveume1pathogen
Outcome
Fon populatione0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
monoculture systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Fon population declined significantly in the watermelon/wheat companion system compared with the monoculture system (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Fon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping changed the relative abundance of watermelon rhizosphere microbial communities.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
relative abundance of microbial communitiese0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the relative abundance of microbial communities was changed in the rhizosphere of watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping increased Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes relative abundance.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculture systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with the monoculture system, the relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes and Sordariomycetes were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping increased Sordariomycetes relative abundance.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
Sordariomycetese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes and Sordariomycetes were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping decreased Gammaproteobacteria, Sphingobacteria and Cytophagia relative abundance.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
relative abundances of Gammaproteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Cytophagiae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the relative abundances of Gammaproteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Cytophagia, Pezizomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping decreased Pezizomycetes and Eurotiomycetes relative abundance.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Outcome
Pezizomycetes, and Eurotiomycetese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pezizomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion cropping decreased Fusarium wilt incidence in watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust1
Treatment
D123 wheat as a companion cropt0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Fusarium wilte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“D123 wheat as a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the incidence of Fusarium wilt was also decreased in the watermelon/wheat companion system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1477 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Triticum aestivum · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Triticum aestivum · soil: biology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Triticum aestivum · Fusarium · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · soil: biology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · Fusarium · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.