Paper · 2001 · Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal

Literature and insights Insider daaling

Robert Jupe

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The foliar application of Nod factor [Nod Bj V (C(18:1), MeFuc)] enhanced (P<0.05) the photosynthetic rate of corn; the increases were 36%, 23% and 12% for 10(-6), 10(-8) and 10(-10)M treated plants, respectively. Similarly, lumichrome at 10(-5) and 10(-6)M stimulated the photosynthetic rate of corn plants 1 and 2 days after application. Lumichrome (10(-5) and 10(-6)M) also increased the photosynthetic rates of soybean plants 3 days after treatment. Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M) to corn and soybean and of lumichrome (10(-5)M) to soybean increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass relative to control plants. However, lumichrome treatments did not affect any growth variable of corn. Results of this study indicate that this signal compound can enhance the photosynthetic rate and growth of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nod factor at 10(-6)M enhanced the photosynthetic rate of corn by 36% (P<0.05).

Treatment
foliar application of Nod factore1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
36%e1
Qualifier
10(-6)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The foliar application of Nod factor [Nod Bj V (C(18:1), MeFuc)] enhanced (P<0.05) the photosynthetic rate of corn; the increases were 36%, 23% and 12% for 10(-6), 10(-8) and 10(-10)M treated plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nod factor at 10(-8)M enhanced the photosynthetic rate of corn by 23% (P<0.05).

Treatment
foliar application of Nod factore1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
23%e1
Qualifier
10(-8)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The foliar application of Nod factor [Nod Bj V (C(18:1), MeFuc)] enhanced (P<0.05) the photosynthetic rate of corn; the increases were 36%, 23% and 12% for 10(-6), 10(-8) and 10(-10)M treated plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nod factor at 10(-10)M enhanced the photosynthetic rate of corn by 12% (P<0.05).

Treatment
foliar application of Nod factore1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
12%e1
Qualifier
10(-10)Me1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The foliar application of Nod factor [Nod Bj V (C(18:1), MeFuc)] enhanced (P<0.05) the photosynthetic rate of corn; the increases were 36%, 23% and 12% for 10(-6), 10(-8) and 10(-10)M treated plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lumichrome at 10(-5) and 10(-6)M stimulated the photosynthetic rate of corn 1 and 2 days after application.

Treatment
lumichrome at 10(-5) and 10(-6)Me2
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee2
Direction
stimulatede2
Qualifier
1 and 2 days after applicatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Similarly, lumichrome at 10(-5) and 10(-6)M stimulated the photosynthetic rate of corn plants 1 and 2 days after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lumichrome at 10(-5) and 10(-6)M increased the photosynthetic rate of soybean 3 days after treatment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
Lumichrome (10(-5) and 10(-6)M)e3
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
3 days after treatmente3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Lumichrome (10(-5) and 10(-6)M) also increased the photosynthetic rates of soybean plants 3 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LCO at 10(-6)M increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass of corn relative to control plants.

Treatment
Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M)e4
Outcome
leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry masse4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M) to corn and soybean and of lumichrome (10(-5)M) to soybean increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass relative to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LCO at 10(-6)M increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass of soybean relative to control plants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M)e4
Outcome
leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry masse4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M) to corn and soybean and of lumichrome (10(-5)M) to soybean increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass relative to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar lumichrome at 10(-5)M increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass of soybean relative to control plants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
lumichrome (10(-5)M)e4
Outcome
leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry masse4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar applications of LCO (10(-6)M) to corn and soybean and of lumichrome (10(-5)M) to soybean increased leaf area, shoot dry mass and total dry mass relative to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lumichrome treatments did not affect any growth variable of corn.

Treatment
lumichrome treatmentse5
Outcome
growth variablee5
Direction
did not affecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“However, lumichrome treatments did not affect any growth variable of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–706 · show in text ↑

lumichrome · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lumichrome · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

application · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 171 positive, 36 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.