Paper · 2014 · HortTechnology

A Rapid Method to Assess Grape Rust Mites on Leaves and Observations from Case Studies in Western Oregon Vineyards

R. Paul Schreiner; Patricia A. Skinkis; Amy J. Dreves

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The grape rust mite [ Calepitrimerus vitis (Acari: Eriophyidae)] is an important pest of grapevines ( Vitis sp.) in grape-growing regions around the world. A rapid method for extracting eriophyoid mites was adapted from earlier studies to provide integrated pest management (IPM) consultants and commercial growers with a practical, efficient, and reliable tool to monitor grape rust mites in vineyards and nursery stock vines. The rinse in bag (RIB) method allows quick extraction of mites from young shoots or from leaves using 35% to 70% ethanol or isopropanol in a sealable plastic bag. The RIB method recovered ≈85% of grape rust mites from single leaves in the first rinse. The method is useful to estimate grape rust mites on young shoots (≤10 cm length), although recovery of grape rust mites (average ranging from 35% to 81%) was lower because of a higher density of trichomes on young shoots as compared with leaf samples. The RIB method was not effective to assess grape rust mites within dormant buds, so a separate method using a blender to disrupt tissues and extract mites in alcohol was developed. The RIB method was used to determine grape rust mite abundance with leaf symptoms in commercial vineyards and nursery stock vines. The earliest visible symptom of grape rust mite damage on leaves in the summer was the development of stippling that is distinct from the type of damage caused by other grapevine pests. The stippling is described as numerous clear zones of small diameter (resembling pinholes) that are visible when a leaf is backlit. The severity of stippling was related to the number of grape rust mites present on leaves, with >600 occurring on leaves with severe stippling symptoms. In commercial vineyard case studies, the RIB method was used over two seasons and revealed that grape rust mite populations remained on leaves until postharvest, and foliar applications of wettable sulfur reduced grape rust mite populations on leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RIB method recovered about 85% of grape rust mites from single leaves in the first rinse.

Interactor
grape rust mitee1pest
Outcome
grape rust mitese1
Value
≈85%e1
Qualifier
from single leaves in the first rinsee1

Verbatim

e0

“an important pest of grapevines ( Vitis sp.) in grape-growing regions around the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RIB method recovered ≈85% of grape rust mites from single leaves in the first rinse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–678 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of grape rust mites on young shoots was lower than from leaf samples (35% to 81%).

Outcome
recovery of grape rust mitese2
Direction
lowere2
Value
35% to 81%e2
Comparator
leaf samplese2

Verbatim

e2

“although recovery of grape rust mites (average ranging from 35% to 81%) was lower because of a higher density of trichomes on young shoots as compared with leaf samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–931 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RIB method was not effective for assessing grape rust mites within dormant buds.

Outcome
assess grape rust mites within dormant budse3
Direction
not effectivee3
Comparator
a separate method using a blendere3

Verbatim

e3

“The RIB method was not effective to assess grape rust mites within dormant buds, so a separate method using a blender to disrupt tissues and extract mites in alcohol was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earliest visible symptom of grape rust mite damage in summer is stippling, distinct from damage by other grapevine pests.

Taxon
grapevineVitise4
Interactor
grape rust mitee4pest
Outcome
development of stipplinge4
Qualifier
distinct from the type of damage caused by other grapevine pestse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The earliest visible symptom of grape rust mite damage on leaves in the summer was the development of stippling that is distinct from the type of damage caused by other grapevine pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stippling appears as numerous clear zones of small diameter that are visible when a leaf is backlit.

Taxon
grapevineVitise4
Outcome
stipplinge5
Qualifier
numerous clear zones of small diameter (resembling pinholes) that are visible when a leaf is backlite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The earliest visible symptom of grape rust mite damage on leaves in the summer was the development of stippling that is distinct from the type of damage caused by other grapevine pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1429 · show in text ↑
e5

“The stippling is described as numerous clear zones of small diameter (resembling pinholes) that are visible when a leaf is backlit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1561 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stippling severity was related to the number of grape rust mites on leaves, with more than 600 mites on leaves with severe stippling.

Taxon
grapevineVitise4
Interactor
grape rust mitese6pest
Outcome
severity of stipplinge6
Value
>600e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The earliest visible symptom of grape rust mite damage on leaves in the summer was the development of stippling that is distinct from the type of damage caused by other grapevine pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1429 · show in text ↑
e6

“The severity of stippling was related to the number of grape rust mites present on leaves, with >600 occurring on leaves with severe stippling symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1714 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape rust mite populations remained on leaves until postharvest in commercial vineyards.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Interactor
grape rust mitee7pest
Outcome
grape rust mite populationse7
Qualifier
remained on leaves until postharveste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pest of grapevines ( Vitis sp.) in grape-growing regions around the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“In commercial vineyard case studies, the RIB method was used over two seasons and revealed that grape rust mite populations remained on leaves until postharvest, and foliar applications of wettable sulfur reduced grape rust mite populations on leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar wettable sulfur reduced grape rust mite populations on leaves in commercial vineyards.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
foliar applications of wettable sulfure7
Interactor
grape rust mitee7pest
Outcome
grape rust mite populationse7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pest of grapevines ( Vitis sp.) in grape-growing regions around the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“In commercial vineyard case studies, the RIB method was used over two seasons and revealed that grape rust mite populations remained on leaves until postharvest, and foliar applications of wettable sulfur reduced grape rust mite populations on leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1966 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RIB method is useful for estimating grape rust mites on young shoots of up to 10 cm length.

Outcome
estimate grape rust mites on young shootse0
Value
≤10 cm lengthe0

Verbatim

e0

“The method is useful to estimate grape rust mites on young shoots (≤10 cm length)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–761 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.