Abstract
Abstract Indigenous traditional methods of saving and storing seeds are often seen as viable alternatives to purchasing hybridised seeds for small‐scale farmers across the developing world. Nevertheless, little research has been conducted on which particular seed saving methods are most effective. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to both document and test the efficacy of different traditional seed saving methods practiced by small‐scale farmers in rural Malawi. Methods involved conducting both a survey and semi‐structured interview with 40 small‐scale farmers all of whom practiced different forms of traditional seed saving. A representative sample of sorghum and maize seeds were collected from each of these farms and grown in laboratory conditions to test the efficacy and germination rates of seeds stored using different practices. The results revealed that farmers used a wide range of indigenous seed saving techniques that include burning animal manure and covering seeds with the resulting ash to being stored in cloth bags or ceramic containers. The impact of these methods range considerably. Some methods, such as smoking the seeds over the cooking fire, proved ineffective, and germination rates were very low in seeds treated in this way. However, other methods, such as grinding up a local leaf into a powder and covering the seeds with the powder, were as effective as treating the seeds with commercial fungicides. Furthermore, these indigenous methods cost a fraction of the amount of commercially available methods' cost and are also much less expensive than buying seeds annually. The implication of this research is that it is important for researchers to test the efficacy of traditional seed saving methods as a way of establishing best practices and developing appropriate agricultural management practices that will help farmers alleviate poverty. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Farmers used diverse seed saving techniques, including ash, cloth bags and ceramic containers.
Sorghum
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“farmers used a wide range of indigenous seed saving techniques that include burning animal manure and covering seeds with the resulting ash to being stored in cloth bags or ceramic containers”
e1“sorghum and maize seeds”
t0“Rural Malawi”
Claim · model-written summary
Smoking seeds over a cooking fire produced very low germination.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“smoking the seeds over the cooking fire, proved ineffective, and germination rates were very low in seeds treated in this way”
e1“sorghum and maize seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf powder covering seeds was as effective as commercial fungicides.
- Treatment
- grinding up a local leaf into a powder and covering the seeds with the powdere0
- Outcome
- as effectivee0
- Direction
- as effectivee0
- Comparator
- treating the seeds with commercial fungicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grinding up a local leaf into a powder and covering the seeds with the powder, were as effective as treating the seeds with commercial fungicides”
e1“sorghum and maize seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Indigenous methods cost a fraction of commercial methods and less than buying seeds annually.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these indigenous methods cost a fraction of the amount of commercially available methods' cost and are also much less expensive than buying seeds annually”
e1“sorghum and maize seeds”
The same questions in other papers
fire · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →processing · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.