Paper · 2003 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Efficacy of Cultural Practices, Chemical Seed Dressing and Date of Sowing on Severity of Phytophthora Blight of Pigeonpea

V.B. Chauhan; V. B. Singh; Pritpal Singh; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The mortality of pigeonpea plants was reduced to 22.8% when seed treated with apron 35 SD was grown on ridges and intercropped with mungbean. When individual practices adopted separately, intercropping of mungbean, was the most effective in reducing the disease followed by ridge sowing. The disease declined significantly over control when any two practices were combined together. Date of sowing had significant role on incidence of phytophthora blight of pigeonpea. Crop sown on 3rd June showed only 32.5% mortality of plants, which increased to 84.5% with delay in sowing to 18th August.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined seed dressing, ridge sowing and mungbean intercropping reduced pigeonpea mortality to 22.8%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
seed treated with apron 35 SD was grown on ridges and intercropped with mungbeane0
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0weed
Outcome
mortality of pigeonpea plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mortality of pigeonpea plants was reduced to 22.8% when seed treated with apron 35 SD was grown on ridges and intercropped with mungbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean intercropping was the most effective individual practice in reducing disease, followed by ridge sowing.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercropping of mungbeane0
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0weed
Outcome
the diseasee0
Direction
most effective in reducinge0
Comparator
ridge sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When individual practices adopted separately, intercropping of mungbean, was the most effective in reducing the disease followed by ridge sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining any two practices significantly reduced disease relative to control.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
any two practicese0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease declined significantly over control when any two practices were combined together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected pigeonpea blight incidence.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Date of sowinge0
Outcome
incidence of phytophthora blighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Date of sowing had significant role on incidence of phytophthora blight of pigeonpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea sown on 3 June had 32.5% mortality.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
sown on 3rd Junee0
Outcome
mortality of plantse0
Value
32.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop sown on 3rd June showed only 32.5% mortality of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing to 18 August increased mortality to 84.5%.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
delay in sowing to 18th Auguste0
Direction
increasede0
Value
84.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which increased to 84.5% with delay in sowing to 18th August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

intercropping · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.