Paper · 2007 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Performance of Pigeqnpea cultivars in fotercropping system under Rainfed conditions in Vertisols

M. M. Reddy; B. Padmaja; Lei Rao

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out for two years during kharif 2002 and 2003 at Agricultural Research Station, Warangal on vertisol (black soil) to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Treatments comprising of four cultivars (WRG-53, WRG-27, CORG-9701 and WRG-56) and two intercrops (Greengram and Blackgram) were laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Among eight intercropping systems; WRG-53 and WRG-27 either with greengram or black gram have produced significantly higher yields of pigeonpea, greengram, blackgram and pigeonpea equivalent yield as compared to all other systems during both the years. Significantly higher LER, protein yield, net returns and BCR were observed in the above intercropping systems with WRG-53 followed by WRG-27 and WRG-56. The performance of WRG-53 and WRG-27 were at par when intercropped with greengram or blackgram, followed by WRG-56 in producing the net returns, BCR, protein yield and LER. It was also observed that incidence of pod borer and crop damage was minimum (5.1%), when WRG-53 was intercropped with greengram compared to CORG-9701 (10.0%) intercropped with greengram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 and WRG-27 intercropped with greengram or blackgram significantly increased pigeonpea, greengram and blackgram yields compared with all other systems.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53 and WRG-27e1
Treatment
either with greengram or black grame1
Outcome
yields of pigeonpea, greengram, blackgrame1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
all other systemse1
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among eight intercropping systems; WRG-53 and WRG-27 either with greengram or black gram have produced significantly higher yields of pigeonpea, greengram, blackgram and pigeonpea equivalent yield as compared to all other systems during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 and WRG-27 intercropped with greengram or blackgram significantly increased pigeonpea equivalent yield compared with all other systems.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53 and WRG-27e1
Treatment
either with greengram or black grame1
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
all other systemse1
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among eight intercropping systems; WRG-53 and WRG-27 either with greengram or black gram have produced significantly higher yields of pigeonpea, greengram, blackgram and pigeonpea equivalent yield as compared to all other systems during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 gave significantly higher LER, protein yield and net returns than WRG-27 and WRG-56 in intercropping.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53e2
Treatment
intercropping systemse2
Outcome
LER, protein yield, net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
WRG-27 and WRG-56e2
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly higher LER, protein yield, net returns and BCR were observed in the above intercropping systems with WRG-53 followed by WRG-27 and WRG-56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 gave significantly higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR) than WRG-27 and WRG-56 in intercropping.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53e2
Treatment
intercropping systemse2
Outcome
BCRe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
WRG-27 and WRG-56e2
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly higher LER, protein yield, net returns and BCR were observed in the above intercropping systems with WRG-53 followed by WRG-27 and WRG-56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 and WRG-27 performed at par when intercropped with greengram or blackgram.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53e3
Treatment
intercropped with greengram or blackgrame3
Outcome
performancee3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
WRG-27e3
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e3

“The performance of WRG-53 and WRG-27 were at par when intercropped with greengram or blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 intercropped with greengram gave minimum pod borer incidence and crop damage (5.1%) compared with CORG-9701.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53e4
Treatment
WRG-53 was intercropped with greengrame4
Interactor
pod borere4pest
Outcome
incidence of pod borer and crop damagee4
Direction
minimume4
Value
5.1%e4
Qualifier
10.0%e4
Comparator
CORG-9701e4
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260 · show in text ↑
e4

“It was also observed that incidence of pod borer and crop damage was minimum (5.1%), when WRG-53 was intercropped with greengram compared to CORG-9701 (10.0%) intercropped with greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1217 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

intercropping · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.