Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of new herbicides against grass weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

J. P. Saini; Kishan Singh

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 1997–98 and 1998–99 at Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/ha being at par with diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/ha, produced significantly lower weed dry weight and higher number of effective tillers/m row, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight and hence significantly higher grain yield. Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments. Metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha though controlled all the grassy and broad-leaf weeds effectively, caused higher toxicity to the crop particularly during the first year and resulted in the lower values of yield attributes and the grain yield. Sulfosulfuron did not control grass weeds effectively and hence resulted in the lowest yield compared with all the other weed-control treatments

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/ha reduced weed dry weight.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/ha being at par with diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/ha, produced significantly lower weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl raised effective tillers, grains per spike, and grain weight.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/hae0
Outcome
number of effective tillers/m row, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/ha being at par with diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/ha, produced significantly lower weed dry weight and higher number of effective tillers/m row, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl raised grain yield significantly.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.15 kg/ha being at par with diclofop-methyl 0.80 kg/ha, produced significantly lower weed dry weight and higher number of effective tillers/m row, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight and hence significantly higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha reduced weed population and dry weight and increased yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed population and dry weighte0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tralkoxydim reduced weed population and dry weight.

Treatment
tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed population and dry weighte0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl reduced weed population and dry weight.

Treatment
phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed population and dry weighte0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha increased yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tralkoxydim increased yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl increased yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.10 kg/ha, tralkoxydim 0.40 kg/ha and phenoxaprop-p-ethyl 0.10 kg/ha were also effective in reducing the weed population and dry weight and in increasing yield attributes and grain yield significantly over the remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin controlled grassy and broad-leaf weeds.

Treatment
Metribuzin 0.25 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy and broad-leaf weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha though controlled all the grassy and broad-leaf weeds effectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused higher crop toxicity.

Treatment
Metribuzin 0.25 kg/hae0
Outcome
toxicity to the crope0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
particularly during the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha though controlled all the grassy and broad-leaf weeds effectively, caused higher toxicity to the crop particularly during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin lowered yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
Metribuzin 0.25 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and the grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha though controlled all the grassy and broad-leaf weeds effectively, caused higher toxicity to the crop particularly during the first year and resulted in the lower values of yield attributes and the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron failed to control grass weeds effectively.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grass weedse0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sulfosulfuron did not control grass weeds effectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron gave the lowest yield among weed control treatments.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all the other weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sulfosulfuron did not control grass weeds effectively and hence resulted in the lowest yield compared with all the other weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1023 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tralkoxydim · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

tralkoxydim · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.