Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Effect of Bio-Control Agent, Paecilomyces lilacinus Along with Neemcake and Botanicals for the Management of Meloidogyne incognita on Banana

P. Sundraraju; P. Kiruthika

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of bio-control agent (Paecilomyces lilacinus), neem cake and botanicals (Tagetes erecta and Solanum torvum) against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in cv. Robusta was tested by applying individually and in combinations under pot condition. Results revealed that all the treatments were effective in increasing the plant growth with significant reduction in nematode populations. Among the treatments, the combined application of P. lilacinus + neem cake and P. lilacinus +T. erecta (flower extracts) resulted in maximum increase of plant height (5.3 cm each), number of leaves (26.6 & 25.0), pseudostem girth (11.7cm &11.0 cm), root length (36 & 26), number of healthy roots (42 & 43), root weight (45 each), root gall index (1) and nematode population from soils (30 & 50/250cc) and roots (110 & 115/5g) compared to the maximum root gall index (5) with the nematode population from soil (1020/250 cc) and roots (1760/5g) in nematode alone- inoculated control plants. The estimation of proteins, phenol, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase detected from roots and leaves showed an increase in total orth-dihydroxy phenols and enhanced activities of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase on inoculation of M. incognita.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased banana growth and significantly reduced nematode populations.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments were effective in increasing the plant growth with significant reduction in nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinus plus neem cake gave a maximum banana height increase of 5.3 cm.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
P. lilacinus + neem cakee0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of P. lilacinus + neem cake and P. lilacinus +T. erecta (flower extracts) resulted in maximum increase of plant height (5.3 cm each)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinus plus T. erecta flower extract gave a maximum banana height increase of 5.3 cm.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
P. lilacinus +T. erecta (flower extracts)e0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. lilacinus +T. erecta (flower extracts) resulted in maximum increase of plant height (5.3 cm each)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita inoculation increased root ortho-dihydroxy phenols and polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activities.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
inoculation of M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
total orth-dihydroxy phenols and enhanced activities of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidasee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed an increase in total orth-dihydroxy phenols and enhanced activities of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase on inoculation of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–140 · show in text ↑

Purpureocillium lilacinum · growth · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · MusaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · growth · MusaResults agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.