Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

Productivity, economics and water use efficiency of rainfed pigeonpea + black gram intercropping as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Narendra Kumawat; Rajendra Prasad Singh; Rakesh Kumar

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at research farm, Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi during monsoon season of 2008 and 2009 with three planting systems viz., sole planting (S1), normal planting (60 × 20 cm) + blackgram (S2) and paired row planting (80+40 cm and 20 cm) + blackgram (S3) as main plot treatments and nine integrated nutrient management treatments to assess the response of pigeonpea + blackgram intercropping system to integrated nutrient management under rainfed ecosystem of eastern Uttar Pradesh. The results revealed that pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), gross return, net return, B: C ratio and monetary advantage index (MAI) were higher in normal planting during both the years of investigation. Both the planting systems (normal planting and paired row planting) were statistically at par to each other and significantly superior to sole planting. Total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall use efficiency were higher under normal planting of pigeonpea. Significantly higher yield attributes and yield, pigeonpea equivalent yield, land equivalent ratio, gross return, net return, B:C ratio and monetary advantage index were recorded with 100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha −1. Highest total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall efficiency were also higher with 100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha−1 during both the years of study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal planting increased pigeonpea equivalent yield, land equivalent ratio, and economic returns.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
normal plantinge0
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), gross return, net return, B: C ratio and monetary advantage index (MAI)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during both the years of investigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), gross return, net return, B: C ratio and monetary advantage index (MAI) were higher in normal planting during both the years of investigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal and paired row planting were statistically at par and superior to sole planting.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
normal planting and paired row plantinge0
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the planting systems (normal planting and paired row planting) were statistically at par to each other and significantly superior to sole planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea + black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal planting increased total and effective rainfall use efficiency of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
normal plantinge0
Outcome
Total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall use efficiency were higher under normal planting of pigeonpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient treatment produced higher yield attributes, yield, intercropping efficiency, and economic metrics.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha −1e0
Outcome
yield attributes and yield, pigeonpea equivalent yield, land equivalent ratio, gross return, net return, B:C ratio and monetary advantage indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yield attributes and yield, pigeonpea equivalent yield, land equivalent ratio, gross return, net return, B:C ratio and monetary advantage index were recorded with 100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha −1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea + black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient treatment gave the highest total and effective rainfall use efficiency in both years.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during both the years of studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest total rainfall use efficiency and effective rainfall efficiency were also higher with 100% RDF + 50% RDN +5 kg Zn ha−1 during both the years of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea + black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.