Paper · 1983 · Nematropica

Effects of Cover Crops and Fallowing on Populations of Belonolaimus longicaudatus and Meloidogyne incognita and Subsequent Crop Yields

H. L. Rhoades

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

High populations of the sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, developed on summer cover crops of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense), sesbania (Sesbania exaltata), and weeds. Moderate populations occurred on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), but populations were low after hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and fallowing. A root-knot nematode. Meloidogyne incognita, did not develop to high populations on any of the crops but was more numerous on vegetable crops following sesbania and cowpea. Yields of the first crops (snap beans and cabbage) following the cover crops that had built up populations of B. longicaudatus were greatly increased following in-row applications of 2.24 kg/ha of fenamiphos. Only moderate increases in yield occurred for treatment with fenamiphos following soil fallow and cover crops that did not build up this nematode. Yields of the second crop of vegetables (cucumbers) following the summer cover crops and fallowing were improved and popul

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High sting nematode populations developed on sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cover crops.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanenseSorghum bicolore0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
High populations of the sting nematodee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High populations of the sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, developed on summer cover crops of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense), sesbania (Sesbania exaltata), and weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High sting nematode populations developed on sesbania cover crops.

Taxon
Sesbania exaltatae0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
High populations of the sting nematodee0

Verbatim

e0

“High populations of the sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, developed on summer cover crops of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense), sesbania (Sesbania exaltata), and weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High sting nematode populations developed on weeds.

Taxon
weedse0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
High populations of the sting nematodee0

Verbatim

e0

“High populations of the sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, developed on summer cover crops of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense), sesbania (Sesbania exaltata), and weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate sting nematode populations occurred on cowpea.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse1pest
Outcome
Moderate populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate populations occurred on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), but populations were low after hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and fallowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–346 · show in text ↑
e1

“Belonolaimus longicaudatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sting nematode populations were low after hairy indigo.

Taxon
Indigofera hirsutaIndigofera hirsutae0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse1pest
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Indigofera hirsuta
Indigofera hirsuta · TaxonAlex Popovkin, Bahia, Brazil from Brazil · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations were low after hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and fallowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“Belonolaimus longicaudatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sting nematode populations were low after fallowing.

Taxon
Indigofera hirsutaIndigofera hirsutae0
Treatment
fallowinge0
Interactor
Belonolaimus longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse1pest
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Indigofera hirsuta
Indigofera hirsuta · TaxonAlex Popovkin, Bahia, Brazil from Brazil · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations were low after hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and fallowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“Belonolaimus longicaudatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knot nematode populations did not become high on any tested crop.

Taxon
cropse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
did not develop to highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A root-knot nematode. Meloidogyne incognita, did not develop to high populations on any of the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–447 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knot nematodes were more numerous on vegetables following sesbania.

Taxon
vegetable cropse0
Treatment
following sesbaniae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
Meloidogyne incognitae0
Direction
more numerouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meloidogyne incognita, did not develop to high populations on any of the crops but was more numerous on vegetable crops following sesbania and cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–519 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knot nematodes were more numerous on vegetables following cowpea.

Taxon
vegetable cropse0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
Meloidogyne incognitae0
Direction
more numerouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meloidogyne incognita, did not develop to high populations on any of the crops but was more numerous on vegetable crops following sesbania and cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos greatly increased yields of snap beans and cabbage after cover crops that built up sting nematodes.

Taxon
snap beans and cabbagee0
Treatment
in-row applications of 2.24 kg/ha of fenamiphose0
Interactor
B. longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
greatly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of the first crops (snap beans and cabbage) following the cover crops that had built up populations of B. longicaudatus were greatly increased following in-row applications of 2.24 kg/ha of fenamiphos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos produced only moderate yield increases after fallow or cover crops that did not build up sting nematodes.

Taxon
cover cropse0
Treatment
treatment with fenamiphose0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only moderate increases in yield occurred for treatment with fenamiphos following soil fallow and cover crops that did not build up this nematode.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875 · show in text ↑

fenamiphos · Belonolaimus longicaudatus · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.