Paper · 2009 · Journal of Northwest A&F University

Physiological and biological responses of alfalfa shoots and roots to salt stress.

Wang Wen-bin; Yun‐Hee Kim; Xiping Deng; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The study was carried out to reveal the changes of growth and antioxidant system in different organs of alfalfa seedling under salt stress and to provide some support for the study on alfalfa vegetation resumption.[Method] Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials,and 0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively.The study analyzed the seedling growth,H2O2 contents,MDA contents,membrane damage,activity and isozymes of antioxidant enzymes of alfalfa shoots and roots treated 7 days by 200 mmol/L NaCl.[Result] NaCl stress inhibited the growth of alfalfa shoots and roots,and resulted in the increase of H2O2,MDA contents and membrane damage. Lower degree of growth restraint effect and membrane damage of shoot and root organs were exhibited in Xinmu No.1 than Northstar.Under salt stress,antioxidant enzyme activity including superoxide dismutase (SOD),ascorbate peroxidase (APX),catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) significantly increased.The capability of scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) took on organ difference in CAT and POD.The CAT activity in shoot was higher than that in root,but reversed in POD.SOD-Ⅱ,APX-Ⅰ,POD-Ⅲ and POD-Ⅳ were identified as sensitive isozyme bands to salt stress.[Conclusion] Tolerant alfalfa cultivar can reduce the damage by enhanced antioxidant protective ability under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl stress inhibited growth of alfalfa shoots and roots compared with control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse1
Treatment
NaCl stresse1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
inhibitede1
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e1

“NaCl stress inhibited the growth of alfalfa shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–690 · show in text ↑
e7

“0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl stress increased H2O2 and MDA contents and membrane damage in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
NaCle7
Outcome
H2O2,MDA contents and membrane damagee2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in the increase of H2O2,MDA contents and membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–760 · show in text ↑
e7

“0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xinmu No.1 showed less growth restraint and membrane damage than Northstar under NaCl stress.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Xinmu No.1e3
Organ / stage
shoot and root organse3
Treatment
NaCle7
Outcome
growth restraint effect and membrane damagee3
Direction
Lower degreee3
Comparator
Northstare3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lower degree of growth restraint effect and membrane damage of shoot and root organs were exhibited in Xinmu No.1 than Northstar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–890 · show in text ↑
e7

“0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly increased antioxidant enzyme activity of SOD, APX and CAT in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
salt stresse4
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye4
Direction
significantly increasede4
Qualifier
superoxide dismutase (SOD),ascorbate peroxidase (APX),catalase (CAT)e4
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under salt stress,antioxidant enzyme activity including superoxide dismutase (SOD),ascorbate peroxidase (APX),catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1060 · show in text ↑
e7

“0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
salt stresse4
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye4
Direction
significantly increasede4
Qualifier
peroxidase (POD)e4
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under salt stress,antioxidant enzyme activity including superoxide dismutase (SOD),ascorbate peroxidase (APX),catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1060 · show in text ↑
e7

“0,200 mmol/L NaCl was used as control and stress treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–431 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The capability of scavenging reactive oxygen species differed by organ for CAT and POD in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Compound
reactive oxygen species (ROS)e5
Outcome
capability of scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS)e5
Direction
took on organ differencee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e5

“The capability of scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) took on organ difference in CAT and POD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity was higher in shoot than in root of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
shoote6
Outcome
CAT activitye6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
roote6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e6

“The CAT activity in shoot was higher than that in root,but reversed in POD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1234 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD activity showed the reverse organ pattern, higher in root than in shoot, in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
shoote6
Outcome
PODe6
Direction
reversede6
Comparator
roote6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e6

“The CAT activity in shoot was higher than that in root,but reversed in POD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD-II, APX-I, POD-III and POD-IV isozyme bands were identified as sensitive to salt stress.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Gene
SOD-Ⅱ,APX-Ⅰ,POD-Ⅲ and POD-Ⅳe7
Outcome
sensitive isozyme bandse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two alfalfa cultivars,Xinmu No.1 (tolerant cultivar) and Northstar (sensitive cultivar) were used as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–355 · show in text ↑
e7

“SOD-Ⅱ,APX-Ⅰ,POD-Ⅲ and POD-Ⅳ were identified as sensitive isozyme bands to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1320 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant alfalfa cultivar reduces damage through enhanced antioxidant protective ability under salt stress.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Material
Tolerant alfalfa cultivare1
Outcome
damagee1
Qualifier
enhanced antioxidant protective abilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tolerant alfalfa cultivar can reduce the damage by enhanced antioxidant protective ability under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1442 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

43 papers: 4 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: oxidative · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · soil: biology · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salinity · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 19 positive, 76 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.