Paper · 1984 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA (BREEDING, MEDICAGO SATIVA).

S. G. Allen

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The application of fertilizers and saline irrigation water have resulted in increased soil salinity and the removal of large land areas from crop production. One method to overcome the effects of soil salinity is to increase the salt tolerance of crops. The objective of this research was to investigate the physiological, genetic, and agronomic differences between alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) bred for increased salt tolerance and salt sensitive alfalfa. The materials used in these studies were the result of five cycles of selection for germination NaCl tolerance, AZST 1978 to 1982, and the source population, 'Mesa-Sirsa'. All salt-tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsa were evaluated for ability to germinate in NaCl, NaNO₃, KCl, KNO₃, mannitol and polyethyleneglycol (PEG) solutions ranging from -1.0 to -1.6 MPa of osmotic potential and a control of distilled water. Germination in the lower osmotic potentials of all germination medias was significantly higher with each succeeding cycle of selection for germination NaCl tolerance. Selection for tolerance to NaCl during germination also resulted in increased tolerance to the other salts as well as mannitol and PEG. Germination in mannitol was higher than in any of the salt solutions. This suggests that ion toxicity also inhibits germination. There was no significant difference between Mesa-Sirsa and AZST 1982, the most salt-tolerant cycle, in seed respiration in NaCl solutions or in uptake of tritiated NaCl solution during germination. Broadsense heritability of germination NaCl tolerance was estimated at 49%. All the Arizona Salt Tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsa were evaluated for several mature plant characteristics under non-saline field conditions. There were no significant differences among germplasm sources in forage yield, apparent photosynthesis, transpiration, or diffusive resistance. Seedlings of Mesa-Sirsa and AZST 1982 were grown in NaCl solutions ranging from 0 to 18000 ppm NaCl in the greenhouse. The plants were evaluated for several plant growth characteristics to determine whether selection for germination NaCl tolerance resulted in increased salt tolerance at more mature plant growth stages. There was no evidence that germination salt tolerance is related to salt tolerance at later growth stages in alfalfa. Salt tolerance during germination and later growth stages may be controlled by different physiological and genetic mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination in lower osmotic potentials was significantly higher with each succeeding cycle of selection for germination NaCl tolerance in alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
selection for germination NaCl tolerancee1
Outcome
Germinatione1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Germination in the lower osmotic potentials of all germination medias was significantly higher with each succeeding cycle of selection for germination NaCl tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for germination NaCl tolerance increased tolerance to other salts, mannitol and PEG in alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Selection for tolerance to NaCl during germinatione2
Outcome
tolerance to the other saltse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“Selection for tolerance to NaCl during germination also resulted in increased tolerance to the other salts as well as mannitol and PEG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination in mannitol was higher than in any of the salt solutions in alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
mannitole3
Outcome
Germinatione3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
any of the salt solutionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“Germination in mannitol was higher than in any of the salt solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1241 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ion toxicity is suggested to inhibit germination in alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Outcome
inhibits germinatione4
Qualifier
ion toxicitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e4

“This suggests that ion toxicity also inhibits germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1300 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed respiration in NaCl solutions and uptake of tritiated NaCl during germination did not differ between Mesa-Sirsa and AZST 1982.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
AZST 1982e5
Outcome
seed respiration in NaCl solutions or in uptake of tritiated NaCl solutione5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
Mesa-Sirsae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant difference between Mesa-Sirsa and AZST 1982, the most salt-tolerant cycle, in seed respiration in NaCl solutions or in uptake of tritiated NaCl solution during germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability of germination NaCl tolerance in alfalfa was estimated at 49%.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Outcome
Broadsense heritability of germination NaCl tolerancee6
Value
49%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e6

“Broadsense heritability of germination NaCl tolerance was estimated at 49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1574 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage yield did not differ among alfalfa germplasm sources under non-saline field conditions.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Arizona Salt Tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsae0
Outcome
forage yielde7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Setting
non-saline field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were no significant differences among germplasm sources in forage yield, apparent photosynthesis, transpiration, or diffusive resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1861 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the Arizona Salt Tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsa were evaluated for several mature plant characteristics under non-saline field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1717 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent photosynthesis, transpiration and diffusive resistance did not differ among alfalfa germplasm sources under non-saline field conditions.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Arizona Salt Tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsae0
Outcome
apparent photosynthesis, transpiration, or diffusive resistancee7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Setting
non-saline field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were no significant differences among germplasm sources in forage yield, apparent photosynthesis, transpiration, or diffusive resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1861 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the Arizona Salt Tolerant cycles and Mesa-Sirsa were evaluated for several mature plant characteristics under non-saline field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1717 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No evidence was found that germination salt tolerance is related to salt tolerance at later growth stages in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
salt tolerance at later growth stagese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
germination salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no evidence that germination salt tolerance is related to salt tolerance at later growth stages in alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2184–2300 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Salt tolerance during germination and at later growth stages may be controlled by different physiological and genetic mechanisms in alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Outcome
Salt tolerance during germination and later growth stagese1
Qualifier
different physiological and genetic mechanismse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salt tolerance during germination and later growth stages may be controlled by different physiological and genetic mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2427 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

43 papers: 4 positive, 39 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

sodium chloride · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

processing · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.