Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

FRUIT QUALITY AND POSTHARVEST PERFORMANCE OF 'CRIPPS PINK' APPLE IN RELATION TO WITHHOLDING IRRIGATION

W.S. Wan Zaliha; Z. Singh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We investigated the effects of withholding irrigation (WHI) at various stages of apple fruit development in improving fruit quality at harvest, particularly fruit colour without adversely affecting storage life and quality. WHI treatments were applied during stage II and III of fruit development commencing from 135, 145 and 155 days after full bloom (DAFB). Treatments were (i) T1, commercial irrigation as a control, (ii) T2, WHI from 135 to 153 DAFB, (iii) T3, WHI from 145 to 175 DAFB, and (iv) T4, WHI from 155 to 200 DAFB. WHI applied in T3 significantly reduced leaf water potential, 10 days after the commencement of WHI. WHI treatments did not significantly affect the cumulative fruit drop on 195 DAFB than T1. WHI treatment (T3) enhanced red skin colour, concentration of total anthocyanins, soluble solids concentration and firmness at harvest as compared to T1. Fruit from T3 stored at 0±0.1°C, 90±2% RH for 70 and 140 days retained higher firmness (>68N) and SSC (>15°Brix) as compared to T1. However, prolonged cold storage periods decreased titratable acidity of the fruit from irrespective of WHI treatments. WHI fruit from T3 stored for 140 days showed increased levels of ascorbic acid and total antioxidants in the pulp as compared to other treatments. In conclusion, WHI applied 145 to 175 DAFB (middle of stage II) improved fruit colour and other major fruit quality parameters at harvest without adversely affecting postharvest quality and also reduced water use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 withholding irrigation significantly reduced apple leaf water potential after 10 days.

Treatment
WHI applied in T3e0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
10 days after the commencement of WHIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“WHI applied in T3 significantly reduced leaf water potential, 10 days after the commencement of WHI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation did not significantly affect cumulative apple fruit drop relative to T1.

Treatment
WHI treatmentse0
Outcome
cumulative fruit drope0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
195 DAFBe0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“WHI treatments did not significantly affect the cumulative fruit drop on 195 DAFB than T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 enhanced apple red skin colour, anthocyanins, soluble solids, and firmness at harvest versus T1.

Organ / stage
at harveste0
Treatment
WHI treatment (T3)e0
Outcome
red skin colour, concentration of total anthocyanins, soluble solids concentration and firmnesse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“WHI treatment (T3) enhanced red skin colour, concentration of total anthocyanins, soluble solids concentration and firmness at harvest as compared to T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 70 and 140 days cold storage, T3 fruit retained higher firmness than T1.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
>68Ne0
Qualifier
stored at 0±0.1°C, 90±2% RH for 70 and 140 dayse0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit from T3 stored at 0±0.1°C, 90±2% RH for 70 and 140 days retained higher firmness (>68N) and SSC (>15°Brix) as compared to T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 70 and 140 days cold storage, T3 fruit retained higher SSC than T1.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
>15°Brixe0
Qualifier
stored at 0±0.1°C, 90±2% RH for 70 and 140 dayse0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit from T3 stored at 0±0.1°C, 90±2% RH for 70 and 140 days retained higher firmness (>68N) and SSC (>15°Brix) as compared to T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1006 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged cold storage decreased fruit titratable acidity regardless of irrigation treatment.

Treatment
prolonged cold storage periodse0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
irrespective of WHI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“prolonged cold storage periods decreased titratable acidity of the fruit from irrespective of WHI treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 fruit stored 140 days had increased ascorbic acid and antioxidant levels versus other treatments.

Organ / stage
pulpe0
Treatment
WHI fruit from T3e0
Outcome
levels of ascorbic acid and total antioxidantse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
stored for 140 dayse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“WHI fruit from T3 stored for 140 days showed increased levels of ascorbic acid and total antioxidants in the pulp as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1272 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude withholding irrigation from 145 to 175 DAFB improved harvest quality while reducing water use.

Treatment
WHI applied 145 to 175 DAFBe0
Outcome
improved fruit colour and other major fruit quality parameters at harvest without adversely affecting postharvest quality and also reduced water usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“WHI applied 145 to 175 DAFB (middle of stage II) improved fruit colour and other major fruit quality parameters at harvest without adversely affecting postharvest quality and also reduced water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1486 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 26 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.