Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of deficit irrigation applied in different periods to dwarf rootstock apple trees (cv. ‘Braeburn’)on vegetative development, yield, fruit quality and marketable yield for three years (2010-2012). There were six different treatments (none deficit irrigation, T1; continuous deficit irrigation, T2; deficit irrigation between the 40th and 70th days after full bloom, DAFB, T3; deficit irrigation between the 70th and 100th DAFB, T4; deficit irrigation between the 100th and 130th DAFB, T5; deficit irrigation between the 130th and 160th DAFB, T6). It was determined that short-term (30 days) deficit irrigation treatments during growing season resulted in decrease for vegetative development and yield. The apples that have both the highest marketable yield and the highest red colour density were obtained from T3 in deficit irrigation treatments. T3 treatments saved irrigation water according to T1 treatment in study years (12.4%, 14.4% and 15.2 respectively). For more efficient use of water resources in case of limited irrigation water, T3 treatment was found to be recommendable for apple growers because it not only saves water but also affects yield and fruit quality least.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Short-term deficit irrigation decreased vegetative development.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- short-term (30 days) deficit irrigation treatmentse0
- Outcome
- vegetative developmente0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“short-term (30 days) deficit irrigation treatments during growing season resulted in decrease for vegetative development and yield”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Short-term deficit irrigation decreased yield.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- short-term (30 days) deficit irrigation treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“short-term (30 days) deficit irrigation treatments during growing season resulted in decrease for vegetative development and yield”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the highest marketable yield among deficit irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- deficit irrigation treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The apples that have both the highest marketable yield and the highest red colour density were obtained from T3 in deficit irrigation treatments”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the highest red colour density among deficit irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- red colour densitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- deficit irrigation treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The apples that have both the highest marketable yield and the highest red colour density were obtained from T3 in deficit irrigation treatments”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 saved 12.4% irrigation water compared with T1 in one study year.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 12.4%e0
- Comparator
- T1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“T3 treatments saved irrigation water according to T1 treatment in study years (12.4%, 14.4% and 15.2 respectively)”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 saved 14.4% irrigation water compared with T1 in one study year.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 14.4%e0
- Comparator
- T1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“T3 treatments saved irrigation water according to T1 treatment in study years (12.4%, 14.4% and 15.2 respectively)”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 saved 15.2 irrigation water compared with T1 in one study year; the unit is unspecified.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 15.2e0
- Comparator
- T1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“T3 treatments saved irrigation water according to T1 treatment in study years (12.4%, 14.4% and 15.2 respectively)”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend T3 for apple growers under limited irrigation water.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- T3 treatmente0
- Outcome
- T3 treatment was found to be recommendablee0
- Qualifier
- saves water but also affects yield and fruit quality leaste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“T3 treatment was found to be recommendable for apple growers because it not only saves water but also affects yield and fruit quality least”
t0“Effects of Different Deficit Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Fruit Quality and Some Parameters: ‘Braeburn’ Apple Cultivar”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
80 papers more in this group
See all 84 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.