Observationmodel-written summary

Two wheat cultivars resisted crown and root rot more than most barley cultivars.

A claim from Influence of Seed-borne Cochliobolus sativus (Anamorph Bipolaris sorokiniana) on Crown Rot and Root Rot of Barley and Wheat · 2010

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two wheat cultivars resisted crown and root rot more than most barley cultivars.

Material
two wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
resistant to crown and root rotse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
most barley cultivarse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat cultivars being more resistant to crown and root rots than most barley cultivars (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1231

Title

Influence of Seed-borne Cochliobolus sativus (Anamorph Bipolaris sorokiniana) on Crown Rot and Root Rot of Barley and Wheat

Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi; Michael Leonard Deadman Journal of Phytopathology 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01684.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ebe1f855ad33dbf6f3dd8790d57b76a134b5828c8084bf5e60fa50c90fde17a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer