Intervention effectmodel-written summary

tiller was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 137.94 × 000 ha-1.

A claim from Soil fertility and productivity of sugarcane influenced by enriched pressmud compost with chemical fertilizers · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

tiller was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 137.94 × 000 ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
tillere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
137.94 × 000 ha-1e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44

Title

Soil fertility and productivity of sugarcane influenced by enriched pressmud compost with chemical fertilizers

SM Bokhtiar; S Roksana; AZM Moslehuddin SAARC Journal of Agriculture 2016. doi:10.3329/sja.v13i2.26579

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e109448dff8358293d66c375a43cfbdc86ba434ea899af9adb02cd6db7ffe8f8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

337 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.