Paper · 2016 · SAARC Journal of Agriculture

Soil fertility and productivity of sugarcane influenced by enriched pressmud compost with chemical fertilizers

SM Bokhtiar; S Roksana; AZM Moslehuddin

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute, Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh to examine the effects of enriched compost with chemical fertilizers on soil fertility and productivity of sugarcane. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 16 treatments comprising four levels of inorganic fertilizers (100%, 75%, 50% and 0%) and four levels of pressmud (enriched by Trichoderma harzianum @ 7.5 t ha-1, T. viride @ 7.5 t ha-1, untreated raw pressmud @ 10 t ha-1 and control). It was observed that germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud. The N (1.47%), K (1.24%) and S (0.17%) contents of leaf tissues were slightly increased with chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmud compared to chemical fertilizer alone. Soil Organic C, total N, P, K and S were higher with pressmud application compared to non pressmud application. Microbial enrichment of pressmud with Trichoderma sp. could save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmud and 25% of recommended fertilizers. It can be concluded that enriched pressmud is more effective than raw pressmud in increasing sugarcane yield and maintain soil fertility in High Ganges River Floodplain soils.SAARC J. Agri., 13(2): 183-197 (2015)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

germination was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 90.34%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
90.34%e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

total chlorophyll content was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 2.58 mg g-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.58 mg g-1e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf area index was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 5.00.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.00e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

dry matter was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 3.41 kg m-2.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.41 kg m-2e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

tiller was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 137.94 × 000 ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
tillere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
137.94 × 000 ha-1e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

millable cane stalk was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 99.15 × 000 ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
millable cane stalke0
Direction
maximume0
Value
99.15 × 000 ha-1e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

yield was maximum under full fertilizer with enriched pressmud at 111.32 t ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmude0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
111.32 t ha-1e0
Comparator
75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmude0

Verbatim

e0

“germination (90.34%), total chlorophyll content (2.58 mg g-1), leaf area index (5.00), dry matter (3.41 kg m-2), tiller (137.94 × 000 ha-1), millable cane stalk (99.15 × 000 ha-1) and yield (111.32 t ha-1) were found maximum in 100% recommended fertilizer (N150 P50 K90 S35 and Zn4 kg ha-1) with enriched pressmud which was statistically identical in comparison with 75% and 50% of recommended chemical fertilizers with enriched pressmud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N leaf tissue content increased slightly with fertilizer and enriched pressmud.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmude0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.47%e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“The N (1.47%), K (1.24%) and S (0.17%) contents of leaf tissues were slightly increased with chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmud compared to chemical fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K leaf tissue content increased slightly with fertilizer and enriched pressmud.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmude0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.24%e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“The N (1.47%), K (1.24%) and S (0.17%) contents of leaf tissues were slightly increased with chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmud compared to chemical fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S leaf tissue content increased slightly with fertilizer and enriched pressmud.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmude0
Outcome
Se0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.17%e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“The N (1.47%), K (1.24%) and S (0.17%) contents of leaf tissues were slightly increased with chemical fertilizers + enriched pressmud compared to chemical fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud increased soil organic C and total N, P, K, and S.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
pressmud applicatione0
Outcome
Soil Organic C, total N, P, K and Se0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non pressmud applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil Organic C, total N, P, K and S were higher with pressmud application compared to non pressmud application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial enrichment could save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmud.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Microbial enrichment of pressmud with Trichoderma sp.e0
Interactor
Trichoderma sp.Trichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmude0
Value
2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial enrichment of pressmud with Trichoderma sp. could save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmud and 25% of recommended fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial enrichment could save 25% of recommended fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Trichoderma sp.Trichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmud and 25% of recommended fertilizerse0
Value
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial enrichment of pressmud with Trichoderma sp. could save 2.5 t ha-1 of pressmud and 25% of recommended fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded enriched pressmud is more effective than raw pressmud for sugarcane yield and soil fertility.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
enriched pressmude0
Outcome
increasing sugarcane yield and maintain soil fertilitye0
Comparator
raw pressmude0
Setting
High Ganges River Floodplain soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that enriched pressmud is more effective than raw pressmud in increasing sugarcane yield and maintain soil fertility in High Ganges River Floodplain soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1578 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.