Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethylene partially reversed dormancy from all three inhibitors only with gibberellic acid or light.

A claim from Reversal of Induced Dormancy in Lettuce by Ethylene, Kinetin, and Gibberellic Acid · 1977

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene partially reversed dormancy from all three inhibitors only with gibberellic acid or light.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Ethylene (16 mul/1 of air)e1
Outcome
dormancy induced by all three inhibitorse1
Direction
partially reversede1
Qualifier
only in the presence of 1 mM gibberellic acid (GA) or lighte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa L., cv. Premier Great Lakes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–77
e1

“Ethylene (16 mul/1 of air) partially reversed the dormancy induced by all three inhibitors but only in the presence of 1 mM gibberellic acid (GA) or light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–329

Title

Reversal of Induced Dormancy in Lettuce by Ethylene, Kinetin, and Gibberellic Acid

James R. Dunlap; Page W. Morgan PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1977. doi:10.1104/pp.60.2.222

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e0ffa74ffecbb540b220f4d5f00f119c946cc62684c6eb0b21b092fae5927a90 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

ethene · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.