Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency

A claim from Optimizing Water and Nitrogen Management Strategies to Unlock the Production Potential for Onion in the Hexi Corridor of China: Insights from Economic Analysis · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Lower irrigation and nitrogen application ratese1
Outcome
water use efficiency, irrigation water use efficiencye1
Direction
lowe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The onion was used as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–710
e1

“Lower irrigation and nitrogen application rates mutually restricted the water and nitrogen utilization, resulting in low water use efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, nitrogen partial factor productivity, and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2575

Title

Optimizing Water and Nitrogen Management Strategies to Unlock the Production Potential for Onion in the Hexi Corridor of China: Insights from Economic Analysis

Xiaofan Pan; Haoliang Deng; Guang Li; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants15010006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-daab4e08ec1663b6655e6ce3e8ae189ca2ac3d5fb131afea6f042acca91a964d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.