Observationmodel-written summary

The five new Xianglin clones of poplar did not differ significantly in seedling cuttings and were suitable for field application.

A claim from Studies on growth characteristics of seedling by cuttings from different parts of new Xianglin clones of poplar · 2009

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The five new Xianglin clones of poplar did not differ significantly in seedling cuttings and were suitable for field application.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Material
new Xianglin clonese1
Outcome
significant differences in seedling cuttingse1
Qualifier
suitable for field applicatione1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar,and which were suitable for field application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–399

Title

Studies on growth characteristics of seedling by cuttings from different parts of new Xianglin clones of poplar

Tang Yuxi Hunan Forestry Science and Technology 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8d7aa83311fa94dedb53874331107ec4ec040956e8acbb546d8966d49d95ae31 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer