Paper · 2009 · Hunan Forestry Science and Technology

Studies on growth characteristics of seedling by cuttings from different parts of new Xianglin clones of poplar

Tang Yuxi

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As to the survival rate of seedlings of the new and old poplar clones in field cutting,there is a very significant difference between the 5 new Xianglin clones(Xianglin-90,etc.) and the control,the Zhonghan-17,which showed with the lowest survival rate.There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar,and which were suitable for field application.Seedling survival rate was decreased with increasing of positions of cuttings taken over,while,there were no significant differences among cutting from second,third,fourth district.Which showed that poplar seedlings with buds on the top of the stem could be used for seedlings.Without drought-resistance measures in the summer case,the survival rate in end of year was lower than the average survival rate in the spring.The preservation rate,seedling survival rate were positively correlated with number of the breaking out at cortex,implied that the more primordia at the beginning and the number of breaking out at cortex in water culture and parts section,the higher survival rate and breeding preservation rate in the clones.The survival rate,preservation rate had no related with the hair root length in water culture.The seedling height growth had no relations with the number of breaking out at cortex in water culture,or the number of adventitious roots,or length.The results showed that the most important and most reliable procedure for identificating propagation ability of new clones of poplar cutting is to test by field practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control clone Zhonghan-17 had the lowest survival rate in field cutting, very significantly different from the five new Xianglin clones.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Material
Zhonghan-17e0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Qualifier
lowest survival ratee0
Setting
field cuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As to the survival rate of seedlings of the new and old poplar clones in field cutting,there is a very significant difference between the 5 new Xianglin clones(Xianglin-90,etc.) and the control,the Zhonghan-17,which showed with the lowest survival rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The five new Xianglin clones of poplar did not differ significantly in seedling cuttings and were suitable for field application.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Material
new Xianglin clonese1
Outcome
significant differences in seedling cuttingse1
Qualifier
suitable for field applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar,and which were suitable for field application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling survival rate of poplar decreased as the cutting position taken along the stem increased.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
increasing of positions of cuttings taken overe2
Outcome
Seedling survival ratee2
Direction
decreasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As to the survival rate of seedlings of the new and old poplar clones in field cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedling survival rate was decreased with increasing of positions of cuttings taken over,while,there were no significant differences among cutting from second,third,fourth district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings from the second, third and fourth positions did not differ significantly in poplar seedling survival.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
significant differencese2
Qualifier
cutting from second,third,fourth districte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As to the survival rate of seedlings of the new and old poplar clones in field cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedling survival rate was decreased with increasing of positions of cuttings taken over,while,there were no significant differences among cutting from second,third,fourth district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–580 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preservation rate and seedling survival rate of poplar were positively correlated with the number of shoots breaking out at the cortex.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
number of the breaking out at cortexe5
Outcome
preservation rate,seedling survival ratee5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–353 · show in text ↑
e5

“The preservation rate,seedling survival rate were positively correlated with number of the breaking out at cortex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–933 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival and preservation rates of poplar cuttings had no relation with hair root length in water culture.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
hair root length in water culturee6
Outcome
survival rate,preservation ratee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–353 · show in text ↑
e6

“The survival rate,preservation rate had no related with the hair root length in water culture.The seedling height growth had no relations with the number of breaking out at cortex in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling height growth of poplar had no relation with the number of shoots breaking out at the cortex in water culture.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
number of breaking out at cortex in water culturee6
Outcome
seedling height growthe6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There were no significant differences in seedling cuttings among the 5 new Xianglin clones of poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–353 · show in text ↑
e6

“The survival rate,preservation rate had no related with the hair root length in water culture.The seedling height growth had no relations with the number of breaking out at cortex in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without drought-resistance measures in summer, poplar cutting survival at year end was lower than the spring average.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Without drought-resistance measures in the summer casee4
Outcome
the survival rate in end of yeare4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
average survival rate in the springe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As to the survival rate of seedlings of the new and old poplar clones in field cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“Without drought-resistance measures in the summer case,the survival rate in end of year was lower than the average survival rate in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–819 · show in text ↑

drought · survival · Populus (poplar)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.