Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Greater irrigation and microbial fertilizer reduced nitrate content.

A claim from Effects of Different Irrigation Rates and Microbial Fertilizers on Inter-Root Soil Environment and Yield and Quality of Brassica chinensis L. · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation and microbial fertilizer reduced nitrate content.

Taxon
Brassica chinensis L.Brassica rapa subsp. chinensist0
Treatment
Increases in irrigation amount and the application of microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
content of nitratee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduce the content of nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1376
e1

“Increases in irrigation amount and the application of microbial fertilizer can increase the yield of B. chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1170
t0

“Brassica chinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–141

Title

Effects of Different Irrigation Rates and Microbial Fertilizers on Inter-Root Soil Environment and Yield and Quality of Brassica chinensis L.

Saisai Guan; Mengyun Xue; Mengyang Wang; et al. Horticulturae 2025. doi:10.3390/horticulturae11030321

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-7d4d62394de241c805e3b6eb167329180e14bdfe03d7a4a6d04b6f1c682508c0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 69 positive, 11 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.