Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% RDN with Sesbania aculeata co-culture gave significantly higher rice protein content than 100% RDN alone

A claim from Agronomic strategies for improving rice protein quality through integrated nitrogen and water management under SRI · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDN with Sesbania aculeata co-culture gave significantly higher rice protein content than 100% RDN alone

Treatment
100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culturee4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
100% RDN alonee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice protein quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55
e4

“remained at par with 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture in respect of protein content but significantly higher than 100% RDN alone treatment during both the years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1173

Title

Agronomic strategies for improving rice protein quality through integrated nitrogen and water management under SRI

Madane Ananda Jagannath; J Bhavadheesh Varma International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i6a.2988

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-418f6c94de3368dac815c2f26302e5983f8910073196bfc78fceeca86e5ae7bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Sesbania bispinosa · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.