Claim · model-written summary
A single AC 263,222 application at 36 g/ha or more controlled most weeds at least as well as sequential standard herbicides.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or moree0
- Outcome
- all weedse0
- Direction
- as well or greatere0
- Qualifier
- with the exception of Florida beggarweede0
- Comparator
- sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DBe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB”
Title
Influence of AC 263,222 Rate and Application Method on Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
Theodore M. Webster; John W. Wilcut; Harold D. Coble Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00045358
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Application method had little effect on weed control.
- Association Application rate affected weed control.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha controlled seven named weeds at least 82% across application methods.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Ipomoea morningglory species 89 to 99%.
- Intervention effect POST AC 263,222 rates produced better yields than pendimethalin control.
- Intervention effect All application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha produced better yields than pendimethalin control.