Paper · 2010 · Crop Management

Postemergence Weed Control in Peanut Using Reduced Rate or Combinations of Imazapic and Imazethapyr

W. James Grichar; Peter A. Dotray; Todd A. Baughman

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted in different Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) production regions to evaluate POST applications of imazapic and imazethapyr at ½× (0.035 kg ai/ha) or 1× (0.07 kg ai/ha) of the manufacturers' suggested use rate and in combination with acifluorfen at 0.42 kg ai/ha, acifluorfen at 0.105 kg ai/ha plus bentazon at 0.05 kg ai/ha, or 2,4‐DB at 0.28 kg ai/ha. Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) control was most consistent with imazapic or imazethapyr plus 2,4‐DB. Imazapic in combination with 2,4‐DB or acifluorfen plus bentazon controlled ivyleaf morningglory [ Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq] at least 75%. Smellmelon ( Cucumis melo L. var. Dudaim Naud.) control was at least 95% with 1× imazapic. Imazapic at 1× in combination with acifluorfen controlled desert horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.) over 90%. No peanut stunting was noted at Yoakum with any treatment; however, at Lamesa, Lockett, and Quitaque peanut stunting was noted. Although 1× imazapic or imazethapyr provided slightly more consistent weed control than the ½× rate, peanut yield did not increase with higher rate. Therefore, growers may be able to reduce production costs with lower rates of imazapic or imazethapyr.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic or imazethapyr with 2,4-DB most consistently controlled Palmer amaranth.

Treatment
imazapic or imazethapyr plus 2,4‐DBe0
Interactor
Amaranthus palmeri S. WatsAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) controle0
Direction
most consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) control was most consistent with imazapic or imazethapyr plus 2,4‐DB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic with 2,4-DB or acifluorfen plus bentazon controlled ivyleaf morningglory by at least 75%.

Treatment
Imazapic in combination with 2,4‐DB or acifluorfen plus bentazone0
Interactor
Ipomoea hederacea (L.) JacqIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
ivyleaf morningglory [ Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq]e0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic in combination with 2,4‐DB or acifluorfen plus bentazon controlled ivyleaf morningglory [ Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq] at least 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full rate imazapic controlled smellmelon by at least 95%.

Treatment
1× imazapice0
Interactor
Cucumis melo L. var. Dudaim Naud.Cucumis meloe0weed
Outcome
Smellmelon ( Cucumis melo L. var. Dudaim Naud.) controle0
Value
at least 95%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · InteractorUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Smellmelon ( Cucumis melo L. var. Dudaim Naud.) control was at least 95% with 1× imazapic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full rate imazapic with acifluorfen controlled desert horse purslane by over 90%.

Treatment
Imazapic at 1× in combination with acifluorfene0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrum L.Trianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
desert horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.)e0
Direction
controllede0
Value
over 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 1× in combination with acifluorfen controlled desert horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.) over 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No peanut stunting occurred at Yoakum under any treatment.

Outcome
peanut stuntinge0
Direction
Noe0
Setting
Yoakume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No peanut stunting was noted at Yoakum with any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut stunting occurred at Lamesa, Lockett and Quitaque.

Outcome
peanut stuntinge0
Setting
Lamesa, Lockett, and Quitaquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Lamesa, Lockett, and Quitaque peanut stunting was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full herbicide rates gave slightly more consistent weed control than half rates.

Treatment
1× imazapic or imazethapyre0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
more consistente0
Comparator
½× ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although 1× imazapic or imazethapyr provided slightly more consistent weed control than the ½× rate, peanut yield did not increase with higher rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield did not increase at the higher imazapic or imazethapyr rate.

Treatment
higher ratee0
Outcome
peanut yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
½× ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although 1× imazapic or imazethapyr provided slightly more consistent weed control than the ½× rate, peanut yield did not increase with higher rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers may reduce production costs by applying lower imazapic or imazethapyr rates.

Treatment
lower rates of imazapic or imazethapyre0
Outcome
reduce production costse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, growers may be able to reduce production costs with lower rates of imazapic or imazethapyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Texas peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–71 · show in text ↑

imazapic · Ipomoea hederacea · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imazapic · Amaranthus palmeri · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · Amaranthus palmeri · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imazapic · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.