Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T9 had higher net return of 75364.02 INR/ha than other treatments.

A claim from Effects of Biofertilizer and Phosphorus on Growth, Yield Components and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had higher net return of 75364.02 INR/ha than other treatments.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobium+PSB + Phosphorus 60kg/hae0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
75364.02 INR/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110
e0

“net return (75364.02 INR/ha) and B:C ratio (2.27) were also recorded higher in T9 which is Rhizobium+PSB + Phosphorus 60kg/ha compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1074

Title

Effects of Biofertilizer and Phosphorus on Growth, Yield Components and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Abisha P.; Shikha Singh International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031159

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-059c33dd24a18072f2ffbc1a6c4be7d86d899ebb9e8910d0a25fcc2e3961bd7f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.