Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment: total precipitation for the growing seasone0
Outcome: pea yieldse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.736 kg/hae0
Qualifier: 1 mme0

Verbatim

e0
“The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yields by an average of 0.736 kg/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186

Title

Dependence of the Pea Grain Yield on Climatic Factors under Semi-Arid Conditions

Vasiliy Gudko; Alexander Usatov; Tatiana Minkina; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14010133

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome: pod number per plante0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818

t0
“pea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15

Title

Response of pea seed yield to water deficit.

Richard J. Martin; D. R. Wilson; Matthew Riddle; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Total water use ranged from 98 to 404 mm between NIL and FULL irrigation.
Association Pea seed yield decreased linearly with increasing soil moisture deficit, from 5.3 t/ha with FULL to 3.3 t/ha with NIL.
Association Peas per pod increased as soil moisture deficit increased.
Intervention effect Seed weight was unaffected by irrigation treatments.
Observation The seed yield response resembled that of cv Rovar in previous Lincoln experiments.
Observation The water deficit effect on yield components differed between cultivars.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage mostly decreased pea yield.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
Treatment: NTe1
Outcome: Yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Yield decrease in NT was mostly observed for winter wheat and pea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1170

Title

Soil characteristics and crop yields under different tillage techniques

G. Mühlbachová; H. Kusá; P. Růžek Plant Soil and Environment 2015. doi:10.17221/567/2015-pse

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Reduced tillage accumulated soil organic carbon in the surface layer relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No-tillage accumulated soil organic carbon in the surface layer relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Reduced tillage increased soil microbial biomass carbon in the surface layer relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No-tillage increased soil microbial biomass carbon in the surface layer relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Crop yields were comparable under conventional and reduced tillage.
Intervention effect No-tillage mostly decreased winter wheat yield.
Intervention effect Reduced tillage showed no beneficial crop yield effect in dry years.
Intervention effect No-tillage showed no beneficial crop yield effect in dry years.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased pea yield in the studied variants was associated with a decrease in grain protein content of 0.33–0.71 %.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment: increase in pea yielde6
Outcome: grain protein contente6
Direction: decreasee6
Value: 0.33–0.71 %e6

Verbatim

e0
“effect of Mikofriend and Mikohelp biologics and Humifriend biofertilizer on the yield and quality grain of Metsenat pea variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–163

e6
“The increase in pea yield in the studied variants led to a decrease in grain protein content, this indicator on a fertilized background was 0.33–0.71 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423

Title

Improvement of biological agricultural methods of growing peas in stationary crop rotation

Plant productіon Іnstіtute named after V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS; S. I. Popov; O. M. Hlubokyi; et al. The Scientific Journal Grain Crops 2021. doi:10.31867/2523-4544/0166

Other claims from this paper (11)

Recommendation Expediency of seed treatment with biologics, alone or with Humifriend spraying at the budding stage, was established.
Intervention effect Seed treatment with biologics and Maxim XL was ineffective regardless of nutrition background, especially at low soil moisture.
Intervention effect Seed treatment with Mikohelp plus Humifriend at 0.4 and 0.5 l/ha significantly increased pea grain yield by 0.27–0.30 t/ha without fertilizers.
Intervention effect Main application of N30P30K30 with biologics seed treatment increased pea yield by 0.57–0.65 t/ha.
Intervention effect Humifriend at 0.4 l/ha increased grain yield by 0.22–0.28 t/ha.
Intervention effect Humifriend at 0.5 l/ha increased grain yield by 0.16–0.22 t/ha.
Intervention effect Pre-sowing seed treatment with biologics and Humifriend at 0.4 and 0.5 l/ha increased protein harvest by 0.450–0.475 t/ha over the control.
Intervention effect Against the N30P30K30 background, protein harvest indicators were significantly higher.
Intervention effect Seed treatment by Mikofriend with Humifriend at 0.4 l/ha gave the maximum protein harvest, 0.631 t/ha, 8.0–8.9 % above control.
Intervention effect Seed treatment by Mikofriend with Humifriend at 0.5 l/ha gave the maximum protein harvest, 0.637 t/ha, 8.0–8.9 % above control.
Observation The increase in gross protein harvest depended more on the level of pea yield than on grain protein content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decreased pea grain and biological yield, by almost half compared with control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse2
Treatment: Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatmentse2
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde2
Direction: decreasee2
Qualifier: almost half over controle2
Comparator: controle2

Verbatim

e2
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUMINOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

Fatma BASDEMIR; Sibel Ipekesen; Murat TUNÇ; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control.
Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control.
Intervention effect Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacteria inoculation gave the highest number of nodules per pea plant, 125.9, against 121.5 in the control.
Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the nitrogen treatment, 109.1, were not significant.
Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-1 treatment, 97.3, were not significant.
Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-2 treatment, 109.3, were not significant.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per pea plant.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per faba bean plant.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a decrease in the seeding rate, weediness of pea crops increased.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
Treatment: decrease in the seeding ratee5
Outcome: weediness of cropse5
Direction: increasese5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“In our experiments, different conditions of moisture supply, illumination and nutrition of pea plants, due to different seeding rates, had a significant impact on the grain yield in the studied varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1131

e5
“With a decrease in the seeding rate, the weediness of crops increases”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1626

Title

The influence of seeding rates on the yield of pea grain in the conditions of the Pre-Ural steppe of the Republic of Bashkortostan

F. A. Davletov; K. P. Gainullina Agrarian science 2023. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2023-370-5-72-77

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: Organic-1e0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: Organic-2e0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: bacteria treatmentse0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantum yield of non-cyclic electron transport decreased throughout photoinhibitory treatment.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment: photoinhibition treatmente1
Outcome: quantum yield of non‐cyclic electron transporte1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“photoinhibition treatment of intact pea chloroplasts”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–228

e1
“A consistent decrease in the quantum yield of non‐cyclic electron transport was also observed throughout photoinhibition treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1583

Title

The kinetics of photoinhibition of the photosynthetic apparatus in pea chloroplasts

M. BRADBURY; N. R. BAKER Plant Cell & Environment 1986. doi:10.1111/1365-3040.ep11611692

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect In the initial 5 min of photoinhibition the minimal fluorescence level increased in pea chloroplasts.
Intervention effect The maximal fluorescence level decreased during photoinhibition of pea chloroplasts.
Intervention effect Electron transport to methyl viologen decreased in the initial 5 min of photoinhibition.
Intervention effect The ability of thylakoids to bind Atrazine decreased in the initial phase of photoinhibition.
Observation Thylakoids became less efficient at generating and maintaining a transmembrane proton gradient during the initial phase.
Intervention effect Both minimal and maximal fluorescence levels declined in the later phase of photoinhibition.
Intervention effect Electron transport was lost in the later phase of photoinhibition.
Intervention effect The capacity to photo-oxidize water was lost in the later phase of photoinhibition.
Observation No further loss of Atrazine binding occurred in the later phase of photoinhibition.
Mechanism Photoinhibitory damage may involve two distinct mechanisms.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics