Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N concentration tended to decrease with compost application in the second year.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment: compost applicatione2
Outcome: N concentratione2
Direction: to decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Three varieties of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) were grown under dryland conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–250

e2
“Plant P concentration tended to increase and N concentration to decrease with compost application the second year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1125

Title

Dairy Compost, Variety, and Stand Age Effects on Kenaf Forage Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentration, and Uptake

James P. Muir Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.9351169x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stagee0
Outcome: fiber linear densitye0
Direction: did not decrease significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased leaf water potential, transpiration, green leaf area, and net assimilation.

Taxon: KenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: water stresst0
Outcome: leaf water potential, transpiration rate, green leaf area and net assimilation ratee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while a rapid decrease in leaf water potential, transpiration rate, green leaf area and net assimilation rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–287

t0
“water stress on physiological characteristics and yield in kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–75

Title

Effects of water stress on physiological characteristics and yield in kenaf

Chaoyun Wang; Yucheng Jie Zuo wu xue bao 1995

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Water stress increased free proline, peroxidase activity, and water use efficiency.
Intervention effect Water stress slowed plant growth.
Association Greater water stress intensity produced greater physiological changes.
Intervention effect Physiological function recovered soon after watering.
Intervention effect Late stress reduced vegetative growth more than early stress.
Intervention effect Late stress reduced dry stem and raw fiber yield more than early stress.
Intervention effect Late water stress tended to promote reproductive growth.
Recommendation Authors recommend water management tailored to stress effects and desired product.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter increased as kenaf density fell.

Taxon: KenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: decrease in plant densitye0
Outcome: Stem diametere0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Stem diameter increased with a decrease in plant density.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1140

t0
“Kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58

Title

Row Spacing Affects Biomass Yield and Composition of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as a Lignocellulosic Feedstock for Bioenergy

Marisol T. Berti; Srinivas Reddy Kamireddy; Yun Ji Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems 2013. doi:10.4236/jsbs.2013.31009

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Row spacing significantly affected kenaf biomass and biofuel yield.
Intervention effect Narrower rows had higher kenaf biomass and biofuel yield.
Intervention effect The highest kenaf densities produced maximum biomass yield of 9.45 to 10.22 Mg·ha-1.
Intervention effect The highest kenaf densities produced maximum estimated biofuel yield of 1354 to 1464 L·ha-1.
Intervention effect Kenaf glucan content was lower at the lowest density, at 27%.
Intervention effect Kenaf xylan content was lower at the lowest density, at 9.8%.
Intervention effect Kenaf ash content did not differ among plant densities.
Observation Kenaf ash content was 0.15%.
Recommendation The authors recommend 30-cm rows and 16 to 32 plants·m-2 for maximum kenaf biomass.
Recommendation The authors concluded kenaf has potential as a cellulosic feedstock in the Northern Great Plains.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kenaf N or P concentrations decreased with days after planting.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment: DAPe2
Outcome: N or P concentrationse2
Direction: decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Three varieties of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) were grown under dryland conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–250

e2
“Yields tended to increase and N or P concentrations decrease with DAP, but were affected by rainfall patterns”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–692

Title

Dairy Compost, Variety, and Stand Age Effects on Kenaf Forage Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentration, and Uptake

James P. Muir Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.9351169x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later planting reduced kenaf yield in 1971 by 66% from first to last planting.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment: successively later planting datese0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: lowere0
Value: 66%e0
Comparator: the first plantinge0
Setting: 1971e0

Verbatim

e0
“In 1971, yield tended to decrease with successively later planting dates and was 66% lower at the last as compared with the first planting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–465

e1
“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–101

Title

Planting Date Effects on Yield, Height, and Stem Diameter of Kenaf¹

John H. Massey Agronomy Journal 1974. doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600060039x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Planting date did not interact with cultivar for yield or height in any year or diameter in 1970.
Intervention effect Planting date did not affect kenaf yield in 1970 and 1972.
Intervention effect Later planting reduced kenaf stem diameter and plant height in 1971.
Observation Everglades 71 yielded more than other cultivars in 1971.
Observation SH/15R yielded more than other cultivars in 1972.
Observation SH/15R had greater basal stem diameter than other cultivars in two of three years.
Observation Cultivars generally did not differ in kenaf height.
Recommendation The authors found no advantage among the tested kenaf cultivars or planting dates.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kenaf yields were affected by rainfall patterns.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment: rainfall patternse2
Outcome: Yieldse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“Three varieties of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) were grown under dryland conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–250

e2
“Yields tended to increase and N or P concentrations decrease with DAP, but were affected by rainfall patterns”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–692

Title

Dairy Compost, Variety, and Stand Age Effects on Kenaf Forage Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentration, and Uptake

James P. Muir Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.9351169x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: low fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber yield, fiber length and widthe0
Direction: maximumse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kenaf yields tended to increase with days after planting.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment: DAPe2
Outcome: Yieldse2
Direction: tended to increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Three varieties of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) were grown under dryland conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–250

e2
“Yields tended to increase and N or P concentrations decrease with DAP, but were affected by rainfall patterns”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–692

Title

Dairy Compost, Variety, and Stand Age Effects on Kenaf Forage Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentration, and Uptake

James P. Muir Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.9351169x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: All NK fertilizer as base fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber yield and linear densitye0
Direction: improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics