View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: amaranth ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing at 3 cm decrease d grain yield to 3.47 t/ha.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Increasing the seed covering depth to 3 cm led to a decrease in grain yield to 3.47 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1204 t0 “amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–21 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Field germination at 1 cm sowing depth was among the highest, at 71%. Intervention effect Field germination at 2 cm sowing depth was highest at 79%. Intervention effect Increasing sowing depth decreased field germination. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 1 cm was 27 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 2 cm was 28 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Observation Plant height at 2 cm sowing depth was 211 cm. Intervention effect Deepening sowing to 5 cm reduced plant height to 181 cm. Intervention effect The longest panicle, 65 cm, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Seed weight per plant was 14.4 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Thousand-seed weight was 0.84 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect The highest grain yield, 3.88 t/ha, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect At 1 cm sowing depth, yield decreased by 0.21 t/ha. Intervention effect At 4 cm, yield decreased to 2.37 t/ha, a reduction of 1.51 t/ha. Intervention effect At 5 cm, yield was 1.62 t/ha and lower than at 2 cm by the reported 2.26 t/ha. Intervention effect The conclusion reports 74–79% germination at 1–2 cm and significant germination reduction deeper than 3 cm, even with sufficient moisture. Intervention effect The highest preharvest density at 1–3 cm was 24–28 plants/m². Intervention effect The highest height at 1–3 cm was 208–211 cm. Intervention effect Increasing depth decreased seed mass per plant and thousand-seed mass. Recommendation The authors recommend 2 cm as optimal, permit 1–3 cm including 3 cm when topsoil dries, and deem deeper than 3 cm impractical because productivity falls significantly. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing deeper than the optimal depth reduced amaranth grain yield to 2.37 t/ha, a decrease of 1.51 t/ha.
or by 1.51 t/ha e0 optimal sowing depth e0 Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine t1 Verbatim
t0 “Amaranth grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 t1 “in the conditions of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–150 e0 “Compared with the optimal sowing depth, the yield decrease d to 2.37 t/ha, or by 1.51 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–96 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Suitable fertilizer decrease d leaf nitrate accumulation.
accumulation of nitrates e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease the accumulation of nitrates in the leaves of amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–441 t0 “Effect of molybdenum on the growth,quality and yield of amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
All herbicides reduced amaranth yield by 0.40-1.37 t/ha.
All the herbicides under study e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “All the herbicides under study also caused a decrease in amaranth yield by 0.40-1.37 t/ha due to the stress effect on the plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1718 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing sowing depth decrease d field germination.
Increase in the sowing depth e0 field germination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Increase in the sowing depth led to the field germination decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–450 t0 “amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–21 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Field germination at 1 cm sowing depth was among the highest, at 71%. Intervention effect Field germination at 2 cm sowing depth was highest at 79%. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 1 cm was 27 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 2 cm was 28 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Observation Plant height at 2 cm sowing depth was 211 cm. Intervention effect Deepening sowing to 5 cm reduced plant height to 181 cm. Intervention effect The longest panicle, 65 cm, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Seed weight per plant was 14.4 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Thousand-seed weight was 0.84 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect The highest grain yield, 3.88 t/ha, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect At 1 cm sowing depth, yield decreased by 0.21 t/ha. Intervention effect Sowing at 3 cm decreased grain yield to 3.47 t/ha. Intervention effect At 4 cm, yield decreased to 2.37 t/ha, a reduction of 1.51 t/ha. Intervention effect At 5 cm, yield was 1.62 t/ha and lower than at 2 cm by the reported 2.26 t/ha. Intervention effect The conclusion reports 74–79% germination at 1–2 cm and significant germination reduction deeper than 3 cm, even with sufficient moisture. Intervention effect The highest preharvest density at 1–3 cm was 24–28 plants/m². Intervention effect The highest height at 1–3 cm was 208–211 cm. Intervention effect Increasing depth decreased seed mass per plant and thousand-seed mass. Recommendation The authors recommend 2 cm as optimal, permit 1–3 cm including 3 cm when topsoil dries, and deem deeper than 3 cm impractical because productivity falls significantly. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease .
sowing rate of 1.2 million seeds/ha e1 field uniformity e1 sowing rate of 0.2 million seeds/ha e1 Verbatim
e1 “At a sowing rate of 0.2 million seeds/ha, the field uniformity was 70%, but it decrease d to 60% at a sowing rate of 1.2 million seeds/ha, representing a 10% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1051 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer at 25 kg AI / ha significantly decrease d amaranth green mass yield to 127.93 q / ha from 145.12 q / ha without fertilizer.
nitrogen fertilizers in a dose of 25 kg AI / ha e4 yield of amaranth green mass e4 from 145.12 q / ha e4 «no-fertilizer» variant e4 Verbatim
e4 “The use of nitrogen fertilizers in a dose of 25 kg AI / ha contributed to a sig-nificant decrease in the yield of amaranth green mass from 145.12 q / ha on the «no-fertilizer» variant to 127.93 q / ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1462 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Panicle length showed an average negative relationship with amaranth yield (r=-0.36).
panicle length e7 decrease inferred e7 average relationship e7 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of amaranth considerably depended on the hydrothermal conditions of the year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–931 e7 “while average relationship was observed between panicle length and yield (r=-0.36) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1770 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the proportion of wormcast decrease d humin and the humin/humus ratio as a whole in amaranth pot cultures.
increased proportion of wormcast e1 humin,humin / humus e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “The research focuses on the influence of the assorted usage of wormcast and pig manure compost on the composition change of humus and amaranth's yield through pot experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–173 e1 “humin,humin / humus showed a trend of decrease as a whole,and the decreasing degree reduced when treated with increased proportion of wormcast ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–491 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0