Paper · 2019 · АГРАРНЫЙ ВЕСТНИК ВЕРХНЕВОЛЖЬЯ

EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER DOSE AND ROW SPACING ON AMARANTH PRODUCTIVITY

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Amaranth is a valuable food and feed crop that can solve the problem of vegetable protein in animal husbandry. The aim of the research was to study elements of amaranth cultivation technology: the dose of nitrogen fertilizers (without fertilizers, N15, N20, N25) and the row spacing (15, 30, 45 cm). The work was carried out on sod-podzolic medium loamy gleyic soil on the experimental field of FSBEI HE Yaroslavl State Agricultural Academy in 2018. The studied parameters were determined according to generally ac-cepted methods. The use of nitrogen fertilizers contributed to a significant increase in leaf area and pho-tosynthetic potential of amaranth crops at the highest values of the background N20 – 4.7 thousand m2 / ha and 324.08 thousand m2 / ha × days, respectively. Increase in row spacing when sowing amaranth raised the leaf surface area value, accumulation of dry aboveground mass, photosynthetic potential, ger-mination and safety at maximum values in the variant with a row spacing of 45 cm. abundance of weed flea, cereal aphid and sunflower fire. Sowing amaranth with a width of 45 cm between rows caused a sta-tistically significant decrease in the number of studied pests, as well as the number and dry weight of young and perennial weeds. The use of nitrogen fertilizers in a dose of 25 kg AI / ha contributed to a sig-nificant decrease in the yield of amaranth green mass from 145.12 q / ha on the «no-fertilizer» variant to 127.93 q / ha, with maximum values for the background N20 – 156, 55 kg / ha. Thus, the greatest effi- 128 ciency was shown by the introduction of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 20 kg ai / ha when sown with a row spacing of 45 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer use significantly increased amaranth leaf area, reaching 4.7 thousand m2 / ha at the highest background N20 dose.

Treatment
use of nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.7 thousand m2 / hae0
Qualifier
at the highest values of the background N20e0
Comparator
without fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of nitrogen fertilizers contributed to a significant increase in leaf area and pho-tosynthetic potential of amaranth crops at the highest values of the background N20 – 4.7 thousand m2 / ha and 324.08 thousand m2 / ha × days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–777 · show in text ↑
e5

“the dose of nitrogen fertilizers (without fertilizers, N15, N20, N25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer use significantly increased amaranth photosynthetic potential, reaching 324.08 thousand m2 / ha × days at the highest background N20 dose.

Treatment
use of nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
pho-tosynthetic potentiale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
324.08 thousand m2 / ha × dayse0
Qualifier
at the highest values of the background N20e0
Comparator
without fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of nitrogen fertilizers contributed to a significant increase in leaf area and pho-tosynthetic potential of amaranth crops at the highest values of the background N20 – 4.7 thousand m2 / ha and 324.08 thousand m2 / ha × days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–777 · show in text ↑
e5

“the dose of nitrogen fertilizers (without fertilizers, N15, N20, N25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 45 cm raised amaranth leaf surface area, dry aboveground mass and photosynthetic potential, at their maximum values in that variant.

Treatment
row spacing of 45 cme3
Outcome
leaf surface area value, accumulation of dry aboveground mass, photosynthetic potentiale3
Direction
raisede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Increase in row spacing when sowing amaranth raised the leaf surface area value, accumulation of dry aboveground mass, photosynthetic potential, ger-mination and safety at maximum values in the variant with a row spacing of 45 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 45 cm raised amaranth germination and safety, at their maximum values in that variant.

Treatment
row spacing of 45 cme3
Outcome
ger-mination and safetye3
Direction
raisede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Increase in row spacing when sowing amaranth raised the leaf surface area value, accumulation of dry aboveground mass, photosynthetic potential, ger-mination and safety at maximum values in the variant with a row spacing of 45 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer at 25 kg AI / ha significantly decreased amaranth green mass yield to 127.93 q / ha from 145.12 q / ha without fertilizer.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizers in a dose of 25 kg AI / hae4
Outcome
yield of amaranth green masse4
Direction
decreasee4
Value
127.93 q / hae4
Qualifier
from 145.12 q / hae4
Comparator
«no-fertilizer» variante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of nitrogen fertilizers in a dose of 25 kg AI / ha contributed to a sig-nificant decrease in the yield of amaranth green mass from 145.12 q / ha on the «no-fertilizer» variant to 127.93 q / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing amaranth at 45 cm row width significantly decreased the number of studied pests, including weed flea, cereal aphid and sunflower fire.

Treatment
Sowing amaranth with a width of 45 cm between rowse1
Interactor
weed flea, cereal aphid and sunflower firee2pest
Outcome
number of studied pestse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sowing amaranth with a width of 45 cm between rows caused a sta-tistically significant decrease in the number of studied pests, as well as the number and dry weight of young and perennial weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1260 · show in text ↑
e2

“abundance of weed flea, cereal aphid and sunflower fire”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing amaranth at 45 cm row width significantly decreased the number and dry weight of young and perennial weeds.

Treatment
Sowing amaranth with a width of 45 cm between rowse1
Interactor
young and perennial weedse1weed
Outcome
number and dry weight of young and perennial weedse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sowing amaranth with a width of 45 cm between rows caused a sta-tistically significant decrease in the number of studied pests, as well as the number and dry weight of young and perennial weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1260 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 20 kg ai / ha nitrogen fertilizer with 45 cm row spacing gave the greatest efficiency.

Treatment
introduction of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 20 kg ai / ha when sown with a row spacing of 45 cme7
Outcome
greatest effi- 128 ciencye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the greatest effi- 128 ciency was shown by the introduction of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 20 kg ai / ha when sown with a row spacing of 45 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1680 · show in text ↑
t0

“AMARANTH PRODUCTIVITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results differ

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · growth · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.