Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1980

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2945158337 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Organ / stage: early growth stagese0
Treatment: 2,4-De0
Outcome: root yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: tended toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“When applied at early growth stages 2,4-D tended to decrease root yield but decreased purity and extractable sucrose content by as much as 54% when applied at later growth stages.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–392

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/hae0
Outcome: root yield at harveste0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: tended toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/ha and 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/ha decreased extractable sucrose/ha and tended to decrease root yield at harvest while picloram at 0.028 kg ae/ha did not significantly reduce root yield or sucrose content at harvest compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–650

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/hae0
Outcome: root yield at harveste0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: tended toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/ha and 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/ha decreased extractable sucrose/ha and tended to decrease root yield at harvest while picloram at 0.028 kg ae/ha did not significantly reduce root yield or sucrose content at harvest compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–650

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/hae0
Outcome: extractable sucrose/hae0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/ha and 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/ha decreased extractable sucrose/ha and tended to decrease root yield at harvest while picloram at 0.028 kg ae/ha did not significantly reduce root yield or sucrose content at harvest compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–650

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/hae0
Outcome: extractable sucrose/hae0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Dicamba at 0.14 kg ae/ha and 2,4-D at 0.28 kg ae/ha decreased extractable sucrose/ha and tended to decrease root yield at harvest while picloram at 0.028 kg ae/ha did not significantly reduce root yield or sucrose content at harvest compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–650

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Organ / stage: later growth stagese0
Treatment: 2,4-De0
Outcome: puritye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: as much as 54%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“When applied at early growth stages 2,4-D tended to decrease root yield but decreased purity and extractable sucrose content by as much as 54% when applied at later growth stages.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–392

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late 2,4-D application reduced extractable sucrose content by as much as 54%.

Taxon: SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Organ / stage: later growth stagese0
Treatment: 2,4-De0
Outcome: extractable sucrose contente0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: as much as 54%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“When applied at early growth stages 2,4-D tended to decrease root yield but decreased purity and extractable sucrose content by as much as 54% when applied at later growth stages.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–392

t0
“Sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.
Intervention effect Late 2,4-D application reduced purity by as much as 54%.
Intervention effect Dicamba reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect 2,4-D reduced extractable sucrose per hectare.
Intervention effect Dicamba tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect 2,4-D tended to reduce harvest root yield.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest root yield relative to control.
Intervention effect Picloram did not significantly reduce harvest sucrose content relative to control.
Intervention effect All tested 2,4-D rates increased sucrose losses in storage.
Intervention effect Dicamba caused comparable storage losses.
Intervention effect Picloram caused comparable storage losses.
Recommendation The authors recommend immediate processing after inadvertent herbicide drift exposure.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics