Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 80% water treatmente4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: decreasee4
Value: 12%e4
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e4
“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–838

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 60% water treatmente6
Outcome: yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 38%e7
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e6
“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981

e7
“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 80% water treatmente5
Outcome: boll weighte5
Direction: decreasee5
Value: 2.5%e5
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e5
“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield, 11% in the number of bolls per plant and 2.5% in boll weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–900

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 80% water treatmente5
Outcome: number of bolls per plante5
Direction: decreasee5
Value: 11%e5
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e5
“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield, 11% in the number of bolls per plant and 2.5% in boll weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–900

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 60% water treatmente6
Outcome: boll weighte7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 24%e7
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e6
“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981

e7
“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: 60% water treatmente6
Outcome: number of bolls per plante7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 37%e7
Comparator: 100% water requiremente1
Setting: Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Verbatim

t0
“cotton under drought stress conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159

e1
“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740

e2
“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357

e6
“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981

e7
“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096

Title

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi Scientific Research and Essays 2011. doi:10.5897/sre11.1435

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.
Intervention effect The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.
Intervention effect The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.
Recommendation The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics