Paper · 2011 · Scientific Research and Essays

Effect of irrigation regime and method of strip irrigation system on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of cotton under drought stress conditions of Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province in Iran

Rasoul Asadi

11
claims
43
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Deficit irrigation is one of the most important methods of management of irrigation to save irrigation water without much damage to plants. Field experiment was conducted in 2010 to study the effect of irrigation deficit and method of irrigation on yield and yield components and water use efficiency of cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran. Treatments consisted of three levels of water requirement: 100, 80 and 60% as main factors and two systems of irrigation: surface drip irrigation and subsurface drip irrigation as sub factors. The study showed that under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9% with a saving of 1500 m3ha-1 water. However, 80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield, 11% in the number of bolls per plant and 2.5% in boll weight. The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water), but it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight. In general use of 80% water deficit method in cotton cultivation using subsurface irrigation could help in saving of irrigation water and increasing water use efficiency under drought conditions prevailing in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran. Key words: Cotton, irrigation deficit, irrigation strip, Kerman, water use efficiency, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under subsurface irrigation, 80% water requirement increased water use efficiency by 4.9% compared with 100% water requirement.

Treatment
80% water requiremente1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.9%e1
Qualifier
subsurface irrigatione1
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water requirement treatment saved 1500 m3ha-1 of irrigation water relative to 100% water requirement.

Treatment
80% water requiremente1
Outcome
savinge3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
1500 m3ha-1e3
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a saving of 1500 m3ha-1 water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 12%.

Treatment
80% water treatmente4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasee4
Value
12%e4
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e4

“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 11%.

Treatment
80% water treatmente5
Outcome
number of bolls per plante5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
11%e5
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e5

“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield, 11% in the number of bolls per plant and 2.5% in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water treatment decreased boll weight by 2.5%.

Treatment
80% water treatmente5
Outcome
boll weighte5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
2.5%e5
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e5

“80% water treatment lead to decrease of 12% in yield, 11% in the number of bolls per plant and 2.5% in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment reduced water consumption by 40% relative to 100% water requirement.

Treatment
60% water treatmente6
Outcome
consumption of watere6
Direction
lesse6
Value
40%e6
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 of water relative to 100% water requirement.

Treatment
60% water treatmente6
Outcome
savede6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6
Value
3200 m3ha-1e6
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased cotton yield by 38%.

Treatment
60% water treatmente6
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
decreasee7
Value
38%e7
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased the number of bolls per plant by 37%.

Treatment
60% water treatmente6
Outcome
number of bolls per plante7
Direction
decreasee7
Value
37%e7
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% water treatment decreased boll weight by 24%.

Treatment
60% water treatmente6
Outcome
boll weighte7
Direction
decreasee7
Value
24%e7
Comparator
100% water requiremente1
Setting
Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Irane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“under subsurface irrigation method treatment of 80% water requirement compared to treatment of 100% water requirement, there is increased water use efficiency by 4.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton in Orzouiyeh region of Kerman province of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 60% water treatment saved 3200 m3ha-1 water (40% less consumption of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“it resulted in a decrease of 38% in cotton yield, 37% in the number of bolls per plant and 24% in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1096 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% water deficit method with subsurface irrigation could help save irrigation water and increase water use efficiency in cotton under drought conditions.

Outcome
saving of irrigation water and increasing water use efficiencye0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of 80% water deficit method in cotton cultivation using subsurface irrigation could help in saving of irrigation water and increasing water use efficiency under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1292 · show in text ↑

irrigation · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 304 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.