View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize yield relative to constant irrigation.
Directionwithout any significant decrease e0 Comparatorconstant irrigation method of the DSSAT model e0 Verbatim
t0 “Precision Irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 e0 “almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427 e1 “DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Excess fertilization did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentexcessive fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The yield is not significantly decrease d under the excessive fertilization. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1159 t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density, grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
Materialmodern cultivars e0 Treatmentlow sowing density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatorhigh sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density, in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield might not decrease significantly when Zaoxian A is used as a parent.
Taxonindica-japonica hybrid rice e1 Directionmight not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Using male sterile line Zaoxian A with a dominant earnness gene as a parent could reduce growth period duration for about 17 days, while grain yield might not decrease significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–349 e1 “indica-japonica hybrid rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–57 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CMS cytoplasm influenced an insignificant decrease in average yield in 7 of the 10 hybrids tested.
Qualifier7 of the 10 hybrids tested e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cytoplasmic male sterility is important for seed production of maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–201 e2 “In 7 of the 10 hybrids tested, CMS cytoplasm influenced the insignificant decrease in average yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–943 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry.
Treatmentdelay in topping until four additional leaves were produced e0 Outcomeyield, grade index, or leaf chemistry e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 e0 “The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens ) caused a non-significant decrease in eggplant fruit yield .
Treatmentapplication of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens L.) e2 Outcomeeggplant fruit yield e2 Verbatim
e2 “The greater eggplant fruit yield was obtained from vegetable grown without companion plants. The application of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens L.) caused a non-significant decrease in eggplant fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1240 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SS3 did not decrease significantly in protein or oil percentage as seed yield increased.
Outcomeprotein or oil percentage e7 Directiondid not decrease e7 Verbatim
e1 “In soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 e7 “The identification of a subpopulation (SS3), which did not decrease significantly in protein or oil percentage as seed yield increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1655 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not decrease significantly until more than 60 cm of plot area was removed.
Treatmentmore than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed e0 Outcomeyield of the genotypes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Generally, no significant decrease in yield of the genotypes was detected until more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–544 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.