View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain N concentration did not decrease in treatments where N was intended to be relatively less abundant than assimilate.
Treatmentwhere relative abundance of N compared with assimilate was intended to be reduced e2 OutcomeGrain N concentration e2 Directiondid not decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–97 e2 “Grain N concentration, however, did not decrease in the treatments where relative abundance of N compared with assimilate was intended to be reduced ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–782 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Striga infection did not decrease host transpiration at 67 or 79 days.
TreatmentS. hermonthica infectione0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “S. hermonthica infection did not decrease host photo-synthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency 67 or 79 DAS. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–484 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench host ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–149 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Common bean tolerated a water table at 15 cm or deeper without a significant growth decrease .
Treatmentsoil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper e0 Directionwithout significant decrease e0 Settingriparian wetland t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) could tolerate soil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper without significant decrease in growth and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–973 t0 “riparian wetland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–103 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
BactoMix 5 did not significantly decrease P. brassicae in soil.
OutcomeP. brassicae in the soile0 Directiondid not show a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results did not show a significant decrease in the P. brassicae in the soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–451 e1 “The cultivation of cruciferous crops is threatened by extensive yield losses caused by the soil-borne pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin, 1877. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 e2 “the bacterial product BactoMix 5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–241 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed planting did not considerably decrease nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiencies.
TreatmentDelayed planting (dry season crop) e0 OutcomeN uptake and utilization efficiencies of N e0 Directiondid not considerably decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delayed planting (dry season crop) did not considerably decrease N uptake and utilization efficiencies of N, but decrease d final crop dry matter yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1196 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At 8 dS/m, protein yield s did not decrease .
Directiondid not result in any decreases e0 Verbatim
t0 “TALL FESCUE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–55 e0 “8 dS/m did not result in any decrease s in protein yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1166 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater accumulation of organic osmotica was probably not enough to decrease the osmotic potential of the tolerant accession.
Compoundorganic osmotica e6 Outcomeosmotic potential e6 Qualifierprobably not enough e6 Verbatim
t0 “pigeon pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–100 e6 “relatively greater accumulation of organic osmotica was probably not enough to decrease the osmotic potential of the tolerant accession ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1613 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The −15 cm alternate wetting and drying with 100 kg ha −1 nitrogen did not decrease rice yield .
Treatmentin combination with 100 kg ha −1 of NF rate e5 Directionwithout decreased e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The straw incorporation in paddy fields exacerbates the reductive toxicity caused by flooding during the rice tillering stage in cold regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 e5 “in combination with 100 kg ha −1 of NF rate significantly increased root activity and reduced reductive toxicity of the tillage layer without decrease d rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1901 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Striga infection did not decrease host photosynthesis at 67 or 79 days.
TreatmentS. hermonthica infectione0 Outcomehost photo-synthesis e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “S. hermonthica infection did not decrease host photo-synthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency 67 or 79 DAS. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–484 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench host ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–149 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane and sugar yield s showed neither a significant increase nor decrease before 1968.
Outcomesugarcane and sugar yields e6 Directionno_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e0 “Florida is the largest producer of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) in the United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 e6 “There was neither a significant increase nor decrease in sugarcane and sugar yield s before 1968. For 1969 to 2000, the increase in sugarcane yield (0.29 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) was less than the increase in sugar yield (0.09 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1613 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.