View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield of 0.24 t/ha.
No-till system e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield on 0.24 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1600 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed yield under stress was largely due to fewer pods and seeds per pod.
The decrease in seed yield e1 largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “three cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–189 e1 “The decrease in seed yield was largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2011 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Precipitation during the growing season negatively affected rice yield in 68% of counties, with a decrease of about 2.3%.
approximately −2.3% e3 in 68% of the counties e3 Verbatim
e3 “GSP negatively impacted rice yield in 68% of the counties, with a decrease of approximately −2.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1093 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The rainfall deficit during flowering and pod formation contributed to the decrease in sweet lupine yield .
rainfall deficit e4 during the period of flowering-pod formation e4 Verbatim
e4 “The rainfall deficit during the period of flowering-pod formation, calendrically the first half of June - the first half of August, also contributes to the decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1077 t0 “SWEET LUPINE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A high rate of N fertilizer can decrease soybean yield under no-drought conditions.
high rate of N-fertilizer e4 under no-drought conditions e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the seed protein and oil concentrations of two soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–739 e4 “It was concluded that high rate of N-fertilizer can decrease the yield of both cultivars under no-drought conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1389 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Crop yield starts to decrease beyond a critical threshold of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
anthropogenic CO2 emissions e1 starts to decrease e1 critical threshold e1 Verbatim
e0 “impact the yield s of essential staple food crops significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–296 e1 “Our findings reveal a critical threshold for anthropogenic CO2 emissions, beyond which the crop yield starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–961 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
FAW feeding only on panicles caused decrease yield .
FAW only had rice panicles to feed on e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Choice bioassays exhibited an increased percent of blank kernels and decrease in yield when FAW only had rice panicles to feed on. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1719 e1 “rice, Oryza sativa , (L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–187 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated cotton had a 82% decrease in yield /plant.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield /plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 t0 “Upland Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield decrease d from generation 17 onward.
decrease in yield e0 from generation 17 onwards e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease in yield from generation 17 onwards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–177 t0 “Zea mays 'Hays Golden'
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–90 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Estimated relative yield losses for postulated ozone pollution levels decrease agricultural crop yield s.
ozone pollution e2 estimated relative yield losses e2 decrease inferred e2 Verbatim
e0 “effects of air pollutants on major agricultural crop yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–142 e2 “presenting estimated relative yield losses for postulated levels of ozone pollution ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–910 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivume0
Vigna unguiculata
Oryza sativa
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays