View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens did not decrease corn rootworm survival.
Entomopathogens e0 corn rootworm species e0 pest survival of corn rootworm species e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Entomopathogens did not decrease survival of corn rootworm species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1163 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated corn planting did not decrease corn grain yield .
repeated plantings of corn e0 Corn grain yields e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Corn grain yield s did not decrease as a result of grazing, or of repeated plantings of corn, ranging from 9,516-10,088 kg· ha-1 across GRAZ and NG paddocks except in 2019 (dry year) when corn grain yield s averaged 6,053 kg· ha-1 across both GRAZ and NG treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1661 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in moisture content at the early drying stages did not substantially affect head rice yield until a certain moisture level was reached.
a decrease in MC of rice at the earlydrying stages e3 did not substantially affect e3 until a certain MC level was reached e3 Verbatim
t0 “LONG- AND MEDIUM-GRAIN RICE VARIETIES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–77 e3 “a decrease in MC of rice at the earlydrying stages did not substantially affect the HRY until a certain MC level was reached ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–989 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most V5 damage treatments did not significantly reduce yield .
treatments at V5 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 e0 “Most of the treatments at V5 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vines receiving 80% of crop water requirement had a 3.70% yield decrease relative to full irrigation, without a significant overall impact.
it did not have a significant overall impact e2 full irrigation e1 Luxor Governorate, Egypt e0 Verbatim
t0 “grape production (Vitis vinifera L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–82 e0 “the Flame seedless grapevines during two successive seasons (2024 and 2025) at a private orchard in the Luxor Governorate, Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–524 e1 “vines receiving 80% CWR had a yield decrease of 3.70% compared to full irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–878 e2 “it did not have a significant overall impact ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1021 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cherry tomato yield did not decrease when fertilizer N, P and K application was controlled within 20kg/666.7m~(2).
N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “when the N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) the yield s of cherry tomato and spring cabbage did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–379 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At 20% shading, fresh tuber yield did not decrease relative to no shading.
purple sweet potato t0 fresh tuber yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the fresh tuber yield was not decrease d, and the accumulation of anthocyanin and soluble sugars in the tubers was increased under L1 compared to L0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–724 t0 “purple sweet potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
An increase in one yield component did not lead to a compensating decrease in any other component.
kompenserende afname in enige van die ander komponente e7 Verbatim
t0 “Opbrengskomponente van koring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 e7 “'n Toename in een komponent het nie tot 'n kompenserende afname in enige van die ander komponente gelei nie ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–807 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No apparent relationship was found between yield decrease and the N, P, K and B concentrations in the plants.
N, P, K, and B concentrations in the plants e2 no apparent relationship e2 Verbatim
e0 “A greenhouse experiment was conducted with soils allegedly contaminated with airbourne dust containing Mg and Ca oxides and carbonates to study the growth and composition of corn, orchardgrass, and alfalfa plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–221 e2 “There was no apparent relationship between the observed yield decrease and the N, P, K, and B concentrations in the plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–544 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield , straw yield or straw N.
foliar N applications e4 grain yield, straw yield, or straw N e4 No consistent increases or decreases e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Hard red winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) studies were conducted at two locations in Oklahoma ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–238 e4 “No consistent increases or decrease s from foliar N applications were observed for grain yield , straw yield , or straw N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1043 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mays
Oryza sativa
Glycine max
Vitis vinifera
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Medicago sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Dactylis glomerata
Triticum aestivum