Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE did not decrease as water consumption fell.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome: water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the water use efficiency (WUE) did not decrease along with the reduction of water consumption”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–593

e1
“WUE of peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–257

Title

Effect of Water Stress on Yield, Quality and WUE during Peanut Seedling Stage

Yuefu Wang Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Seedling water stress decreased pod yield.
Intervention effect Seedling water stress increased seed protein content.
Intervention effect Seedling water stress reduced seed fatty acid content.
Intervention effect Seedling water stress reduced the O/L ratio.
Intervention effect Water consumption decreased under seedling water stress.
Intervention effect Five days of seedling wilting gave the highest WUE.
Intervention effect Moderate seedling water stress can increase peanut WUE.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in leaf photosynthetic rate.

Taxon: Nectarine TreesPrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: paclobutrazole1
Outcome: leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction: no apparent decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“no apparent decrease in fruit yield or leaf photosynthetic rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–573

e1
“The paclobutrazol treatment resulted”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–431

t0
“Nectarine Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75

Title

Leaf Gas Exchange and Growth Responses of Mature ‘Fantasia’ Nectarine Trees to Paclobutrazol

T. M. DeJong; J. F. Doyle Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.21273/jashs.109.6.878

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Paclobutrazol reduced annual extension shoot growth by 67.9% versus controls.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in fruit yield.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol reduced total tree leaf area by an estimated 54.5%.
Association Fruit presence had no apparent effect on leaf CO 2 assimilation.
Association Fruit maturity stage had no apparent effect on leaf CO 2 assimilation.
Intervention effect Treated extension shoots had shorter internodes and larger diameters than untreated shoots.
Intervention effect Treated shoots had larger diameters than untreated shoots.
Intervention effect Treated shoots had more flower buds per unit length.
Intervention effect Treated shoots had higher specific shoot dry weights.
Intervention effect Treated shoots had fewer buds per unit shoot dry weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)projected

Claim · model-written summary

Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant biomass decrease.

Treatment: maintaining AWC depletion below 25%e0
Outcome: biomasse0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“maintaining AWC depletion below 25% resulted in no significant decrease in crop yield and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2257

Title

Water Productivity of Irrigated Tomatoes in Eastern Canada Based on AquaCrop Simulations

Naresh Kumar Thangaraju Arumugagounder; Samuel Ihuoma; Chandra A. Madramootoo Journal of the ASABE 2022. doi:10.13031/ja.14792

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource Measured seasonal harvest index improved AquaCrop performance over defaults.
Method / resource Calibration dry-yield RMSE was 0.57 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Calibration biomass RMSE was 0.89 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Verification dry-yield RMSE was 0.28 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Verification biomass RMSE was 0.01 ton ha-1.
Intervention effect Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant crop-yield decrease.
Recommendation The authors recommend maintaining available water depletion below 25% for irrigated tomato production.
Observation Water productivity was highest in fully irrigated fields across soil types.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transfer from low to high PPFD did not decrease orange quantum yield.

Taxon: orangee0
Treatment: Transferring seedlings from low to high PPFDe0
Outcome: øe0
Comparator: lowe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Transferring seedlings from low to high PPFD decreased ø of grapefruit but not of orange leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–868

Title

Light Acclimation in Citrus Leaves. II. CO2 Assimilation and Light, Water, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

J. P. Syvertsen Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.21273/jashs.109.6.812

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association High PPFD leaves had greatest maximum CO2 assimilation in both species.
Association Low PPFD leaves had highest apparent quantum yield in both species.
Association Low PPFD grapefruit leaves had lower WUE than high PPFD leaves.
Intervention effect Moving low PPFD grapefruit leaves into sunlight raised WUE within two weeks.
Intervention effect Transfer from low to high PPFD decreased grapefruit quantum yield.
Association Changes in assimilation correlated more strongly with mesophyll conductance than leaf conductance.
Association Assimilation rate positively correlated with total leaf nitrogen.
Observation Mature citrus leaves acclimate to new light regimes.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease proso millet yield variance.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceume1
Treatment: adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested rowe5
Outcome: variancee5
Direction: did not decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Variability in proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) yields due to number of rows planted and harvested in field experimentation was compared using four cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–434

e5
“adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease variance”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1201

Title

Yield Variability in Proso Millet Due to Plot Size¹

L. A. Nelson Agronomy Journal 1981. doi:10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300010006x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Harvesting three rows minimised variance of proso millet yield.
Intervention effect Number of rows harvested had a greater effect on yield variance of proso millet than number of rows planted.
Intervention effect Plots with one border row of their own genotype on each side produced higher proso millet yields than plots with zero or two border rows.
Recommendation Planting five rows and harvesting the centre three rows is the optimum plot size for testing proso millet cultivars.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle formation stage nitrogen did not decrease grain yield.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: additional N fertilizationt0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“without decreasing the grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–834

t0
“Eﬀ ect of timing of additional N fertilization on spike number grain yield grain protein and N use eﬃ ciency of winter wheat cultivarKitahonami”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143

Title

Eﬀ ect of timing of additional N fertilization on spike number grain yield grain protein and N use eﬃ ciency of winter wheat cultivarKitahonami

Nobuhiko Fueki; Ryuichi Nakamura; Atsushi Sawaguchi; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungulate foraging did not significantly decrease winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: big game grazinge0
Interactor: ungulatee2herbivore
Outcome: grain yieldse2
Direction: did not significantly decreasee2
Comparator: protectede1
Setting: northern Utahe0

Verbatim

e0
“The effects of big game grazing of winter wheat on grain yield were studied during 12 trials in northern Utah between 1990-92”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125

e1
“plots protected and variously grazed by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–345

e2
“Results indicated that ungulate foraging in these trials did not significantly decrease grain yields despite high utilization percentages on wheat leaves in fall and early spring”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–830

Title

WILD UNGULATE DEPREDATION ON WINTER WHEAT: EFFECTS ON GRAIN YIELD

Dennis D. Austin; Philip J. Urness Lincoln (University of Nebraska) 1995

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation Winter wheat leaves had high utilization by ungulates in fall and early spring.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone did not decrease dark-adapted maximum photochemical efficiency.

Treatment: Elevated O3e0
Outcome: dark-adapted maximum photochemical efficiencye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Elevated O3 did not decrease dark-adapted maximum photochemical efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–561

Title

Photosynthetic and yield responses of an old and a modern winter wheat cultivars to short-term ozone exposure

H. Xu; S. B. Chen; D.K. Biswas; et al. Photosynthetica 2009. doi:10.1007/s11099-009-0039-y

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Ozone exposure lowered light-saturated photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in both wheat cultivars.
Intervention effect Elevated ozone significantly reduced actual photochemical efficiency.
Intervention effect Elevated ozone considerably increased non-photochemical quenching.
Observation Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance declined more in Yannong 19 than Nongda 311 under ozone.
Intervention effect Following ozone exposure, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and flag-leaf chlorophyll declined faster than control.
Intervention effect Ozone exposure caused a 19.2% yield reduction in Yannong 19.
Intervention effect Ozone exposure caused an 8.4% yield reduction in Nongda 311.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial BnBRI1 knockouts did not decrease yield compared with controls.

Taxon: Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment: partial knockouts via CRISPR/Cas9 technologye0
Gene: BnBRI1t0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without decreasede0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“obtained partial knockouts via CRISPR/Cas9 technology, generating semi-dwarf lines without decreased yield compared with controls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–965

t0
“BnBRI1 in Brassica napus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–138

Title

Genome-Wide Survey of Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-Like Protein Kinase Genes and CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted Mutagenesis BnBRI1 in Brassica napus

Min Song; Bin Linghu; Shuhua Huang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.865132

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation 444 BnLRR-RLK genes were identified and classified into 22 subfamilies.
Observation The 444 genes were asymmetrically distributed on 19 chromosomes.
Observation Six BnBRI1 homologs were identified.
Intervention effect Partial BnBRI1 knockouts generated semi-dwarf lines.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In every experiment, nitrogen above 75 kg N/ha did not significantly increase or decrease sugar yield.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: more than 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome: sugar yielde0
Direction: neither increased nor decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“in every experiment, giving more than 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decreased the sugar yield significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–929

t0
“sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110

Title

The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet

A. P. Draycott; D. J. Webb; E. M. Wright The Journal of Agricultural Science 1973. doi:10.1017/s0021859600058925

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Longer growing periods greatly increased sugar beet sugar yield.
Intervention effect Longer growing periods did not change the fertilizer amount needed for maximum sugar yield.
Intervention effect The highest nitrogen dressing with the longest growing period produced the greatest total plant nitrogen.
Method / resource Plant analyses during the growing season had little predictive value for sugar beet nitrogen requirements.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics